Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan;22(1):46-64.
doi: 10.1038/s41571-024-00966-z. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Synthetic lethal strategies for the development of cancer therapeutics

Affiliations
Review

Synthetic lethal strategies for the development of cancer therapeutics

Natalie Y L Ngoi et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Synthetic lethality is a genetic phenomenon whereby the simultaneous presence of two different genetic alterations impairs cellular viability. Importantly, targeting synthetic lethal interactions offers potential therapeutic strategies for cancers with alterations in pathways that might otherwise be considered undruggable. High-throughput screening methods based on modern CRISPR-Cas9 technologies have emerged and become crucial for identifying novel synthetic lethal interactions with the potential for translation into biologically rational cancer therapeutic strategies as well as associated predictive biomarkers of response capable of guiding patient selection. Spurred by the clinical success of PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCA-mutant cancers, novel agents targeting multiple synthetic lethal interactions within DNA damage response pathways are in clinical development, and rational strategies targeting synthetic lethal interactions spanning alterations in epigenetic, metabolic and proliferative pathways have also emerged and are in late preclinical and/or early clinical testing. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of established and emerging technologies for synthetic lethal drug discovery and development and discuss promising therapeutic strategies targeting such interactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: D.G. is an employee of and holds shares in Repare Therapeutics. D.D. holds shares in Repare Therapeutics and Induxion Therapeutics. T.A.Y. is an employee of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center as Vice President and Head of Clinical Development in the Therapeutics Discovery Division, which has a commercial interest in DDR and other inhibitors (for example IACS30380/ART0380 was licensed to Artios); has acted as a consultant of AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Acrivon, Adagene, Almac, Aduro, Amphista, Artios, Athena, Atrin, Avoro, Axiom, Baptist Health Systems, Bayer, Beigene, Boxer, Bristol Myers Squibb, C4 Therapeutics, Calithera, Cancer Research UK, Clovis, Cybrexa, Diffusion, EMD Serono, F-Star, Genmab, Glenmark, GLG, Globe Life Sciences, GSK, Guidepoint, Idience, Ignyta, I-Mab, ImmuneSensor, Impact, Institut Gustave Roussy, Intellisphere, Jansen, Kyn, MEI pharma, Mereo, Merck, Natera, Nexys, Novocure, OHSU, OncoSec, Ono Pharma, Pegascy, PER, Pfizer, Piper-Sandler, Prolynx, Repare, resTORbio, Roche, Schrodinger, Theragnostics, Varian, Versant, Vibliome, Xinthera, Zai Labs and ZielBio; is stockholder in Seagen; and has received institutional research funding from Acrivon, Artios, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, BioNTech, Blueprint, BMS, Clovis, Constellation, Cyteir, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Forbius, F-Star, Artios, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Haihe, Ideaya, ImmuneSensor, Ionis, Ipsen, Jounce, Karyopharm, KSQ, Kyowa, Merck, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Ribon Therapeutics, Regeneron, Repare, Rubius, Sanofi, Scholar Rock, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro, Vivace and Zenith. N.Y.L.N., C.T. and M.N. declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Hartwell, L. H., Szankasi, P., Roberts, C. J., Murray, A. W. & Friend, S. H. Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs. Science 278, 1064–1068 (1997). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Nijman, S. M. & Friend, S. H. Cancer. Potential of the synthetic lethality principle. Science 342, 809–811 (2013). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Kroll, E. S., Hyland, K. M., Hieter, P. & Li, J. J. Establishing genetic interactions by a synthetic dosage lethality phenotype. Genetics 143, 95–102 (1996). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Rancati, G., Moffat, J., Typas, A. & Pavelka, N. Emerging and evolving concepts in gene essentiality. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 34–49 (2018). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Puddu, F. et al. Synthetic viability genomic screening defines Sae2 function in DNA repair. EMBO J. 34, 1509–1522 (2015). - PubMed - PMC - DOI

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources