Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 1;46(1):54-59.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004375. Epub 2024 Nov 21.

Patient Preferences in Cochlear Implant Manufacturer Selection

Affiliations

Patient Preferences in Cochlear Implant Manufacturer Selection

Michael H Freeman et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the factors that drive a patient's selection of cochlear implant (CI) manufacturer.

Study design: Prospective survey study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: One hundred twenty-eight adult patients undergoing primary CI.

Interventions: Survey administered in the preoperative area.

Main outcome measures: Sources of information regarding CI manufacturer offerings, factors that were most important in deciding on a manufacturer, and manufacturer ultimately selected.

Results: One hundred twenty-eight patients were included (average age, 63.7 years; 97% White). The most cited source of information that patients used to choose a device was his/her audiologist (80.5% of patients). When asked his/her number 1 reason for choosing their CI manufacturer, the most commonly cited reason was technology (e.g., battery life, device pairing), regardless of manufacturer. When asked about specific technology offerings, hearing aid pairing was rated as the most important. The numbers 2 and 3 reasons for choosing a manufacturer were cosmetics/structure of the wearable portion of the device and audiologist recommendation of that manufacturer, respectively. The relative weight given to each of the top 3 reasons differed significantly across the three manufacturers ( p = 0.017).

Conclusions: Audiologists are by far the leading source of information used by patients choosing a CI manufacturer. Patients prioritize technology most when choosing an implant manufacturer, but audiologist recommendation and the cosmetics and structure of the wearable device are also important. CI manufacturers should be mindful of patient priorities when designing and marketing their devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and source of funding: There are no conflicts of interest. UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH.

References

    1. Why Choose Cochlear™. Cochlear. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.cochlear.com/us/en/home/products-and-accessories/cochlear-nu...
    1. EXPLORE. AdvancedBionics. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.advancedbionics.com/us/en/home/explore/explore
    1. Cochlear Implants from MED-EL. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.medel.com/en-us/hearing-solutions/cochlear-implants
    1. Carlson ML. Cochlear implantation in adults. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1531–42.
    1. Trinidade A, Cox MD, Hassaan A, Rayburn C, Dornhoffer JL. Does cochlear implant brand influence patient satisfaction? A survey of 102 cochlear implant users. Clin Otolaryngol 2018;43:956–61.