Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;29(4):569-588.
doi: 10.1177/13634593241303610. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

Välkky's voyage on to a hospital ward: Expectations, explorations and emergent robocentric nursing care

Affiliations

Välkky's voyage on to a hospital ward: Expectations, explorations and emergent robocentric nursing care

Sarah Nettleton et al. Health (London). 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Finland, we report on the trial of a teleoperated care robot named Välkky introduced onto a fully operational hospital neurological ward. Our data revealed a narrative arc where participants' early expectations of the hospital-based trial altered as the project unfolded. Greeted with techno-excitement and experimental enthusiasm about the place of robotics in reshaping roles within clinical care, Välkky became the focus for collaborative in situ learning, adaptation and redesign amongst the roboticists, designers, nurses, patients, and managers. Välkky acted as an 'attractor' provoking thinking about, and a reimagining of, future arrangements of care. Our empirically informed insights seek to pave the way for real-world nuanced thinking that pushes beyond human/non-human and success/failure binaries. Building on debates in STS and feminist posthumanism, we propose a robocentric approach, which encourages us to 'queer' health care robots, and to understand them as fluid, hybrid, distributed and relational figures, rather than purely as inert, mechanical, non-human objects that might replace humans. Nursing care practices by and with robots will generate new meanings and practices of care that will emerge iteratively, as caring relations, relationships and practices develop within the context of operational ward environments. Robots may or may not be able support care, but they will invariably challenge what care is.

Keywords: ethnography; organisation of health services; technology in healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Image 1.
Image 1.
Välkky gowned.
Image 2.
Image 2.
Teleoperator with trainer.

References

    1. Alač M. (2016) Social robots: Things or agents? AI & Society 31(4): 519–535.
    1. Atkinson P. (1997) Anselm strauss: An appreciation. Sociology of Health & Illness 19(3): 367–372.
    1. Atkinson P. (2018) The spirit of abduction. Contemporary Sociology 47(4): 415–417.
    1. Barad K. (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28(3): 801–831.
    1. Bedaf S, Marti P, De Witte L. (2019) What are the preferred characteristics of a service robot for the elderly? A multi-country focus group study with older adults and caregivers. Assistive Technology 31(3): 147–157. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources