Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec 5;63(5):942-951.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1040. Print 2025 Apr 28.

Point-of-care testing improves care timeliness in the emergency department. A multicenter randomized clinical trial (study POCTUR)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Point-of-care testing improves care timeliness in the emergency department. A multicenter randomized clinical trial (study POCTUR)

Antonio Leon-Justel et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread problem that positions patients at risk. The desire to improve the ED throughput requires novel approaches. Point-of-care testing (POCT) has emerged as useful technology that could contribute to create more efficient patient flow and better timeliness in the ED. The main objective of our study is to demonstrate, in a multicenter study, that POCT benefits care timeliness in the ED.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter and cluster randomized study. A total of 3,200 patients. We randomly assigned patients to a POCT group or Central Laboratory Group. The primary outcome was the ED time to clinical decision. The secondary outcome included the length of stay and the laboratory turnaround time. Readmission within the seven after discharge was also calculated.

Results: The primary finding of this study is a strategy based on POCT that aims to significantly improve care timeliness in the ED. We found significant reductions in all outcomes regardless of presentation reason, patient disposition or hospital type. Time to clinical decision decreased by 75.2 min (205-129.8), length of stay by 77.5 min (273.1-195.6) and laboratory turnaround time by 56.2 min (82.2-26) in the POCT group. No increase in readmission was found.

Conclusions: Our strategy represents a good approach to optimize timeliness in the ED. It should be seen as a starting point for further operational research focusing on POCT for improving throughput and reducing crowding in the ED.

Keywords: emergency department; overcrowding; point-of-care testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Di Somma, S, Zampini, G, Vetrone, F, Soto-Ruiz, KM, Magrini, L, Cardelli, P, et al.. Opinion paper on utility of point-of-care biomarkers in the emergency department pathways decision making. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1401–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0267 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pines, JM, Griffey, RT. What we have learned from a decade of ED crowding research. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22:985–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12716 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crowding in the Emergency Department: revised edition (June 2014) . London: The College of Emergency Medicine; 2014. https://www.stemlynsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/CEM6296-Crowding... (Accessed 15 Dec 2023).
    1. Hing, E, Bhuiya, F. Wait time for treatment in hospital emergency departments: 2009. NCHS Data Brief 2012;102:1–8.
    1. Handel, D, Epstein, S, Khare, R, Abernethy, D, Klauer, K, Pilgrim, R, et al.. Interventions to improve the timeliness of emergency care. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:1295–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01230.x . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources