Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Feb 1;53(2):e384-e399.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006519. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

Adjunctive Midodrine Therapy for Vasopressor-Dependent Shock in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Adjunctive Midodrine Therapy for Vasopressor-Dependent Shock in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sebastian J Kilcommons et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize the efficacy of midodrine as an adjunctive therapy in critically ill patients. Safety of midodrine was assessed as a secondary outcome.

Data sources: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using a peer-reviewed search strategy combining the themes of vasopressor-dependent shock, critical care, and midodrine and including MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane library databases until September 14, 2023.

Study selection: We included studies if they: 1) included patients with vasopressor-dependent shock, 2) were performed in the ICU, 3) evaluated oral midodrine therapy compared with placebo or usual care, and 4) evaluated one of the outcomes of interest.

Data extraction: We extracted data independently in duplicate using standardized data abstraction forms, which included the following specific variables: patient characteristics, age, sex, type of ICU, etiology of shock, number of patients, study inclusion and exclusion criteria, and geographical location. We also captured the type, dose, and duration of IV vasopressors, any cointervention used, and outcome data.

Data synthesis: We identified seven randomized controlled trials (six included in the pooled analysis) and ten observational studies (four included in the pooled analysis) that met eligibility criteria. Adjunctive midodrine may decrease ICU length of stay (LOS) and there is low certainty of effect on hospital LOS. Midodrine may decrease IV vasopressor support duration, ICU mortality, and hospital mortality. Pooled observational data was based on very low certainty data for all outcomes of interest. The trial sequential analysis-informed required sample size was not met for ICU LOS or IV vasopressor duration and this contributed to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations assessments of imprecision for both outcomes.

Conclusions: Adjunctive midodrine may decrease ICU LOS, duration of IV vasopressor therapy, and mortality in critically ill patients. However, required sample sizes was not met to determine our outcomes of interest. Midodrine may increase risk of bradycardia. While midodrine may provide benefit for patient-centered outcomes, due to increased risk of adverse events, further large-scale studies are needed to inform and guide its routine use in the ICU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Mr. Kilcommons and Dr. Rewa disclosed the off-label product use of midodrine used for orthostatic hypotension and intradialytic hypotension. Dr. Bagshaw received funding from Baxter, Novartis, Sea Star Medical, BioPorto, and bioMerieux. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis diagram illustrating the search and selection process applied for all studies included and excluded over the course of our systematic review. RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plots for the mean difference in ICU length of stay for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (A), observational studies (B), and hospital length of stay (d) for RCTs (C), and observational studies (D). df = degrees of freedom.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Trial sequential analysis (TSA) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (A) and observation studies (B).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plots for mean length of IV vasopressor duration (hr) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (A) and observational studies (B). df = degrees of freedom.

References

    1. Vincent J, De Backer D: Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1726–1734 - PubMed
    1. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A: The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44:925–928 - PubMed
    1. Scheeren TWL, Bakker J, Kaufmann T, et al. : Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2021; 11:21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Harrison AM, et al. : Temporal trends in the utilization of vasopressors in intensive care units: An epidemiologic study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016; 17:19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jentzer JC, Coons JC, Link CB, et al. : Pharmacotherapy update on the use of vasopressors and inotropes in the intensive care unit. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 20:249–260 - PubMed

MeSH terms