Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;135(5):766-774.
doi: 10.1111/bju.16611. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

The impact of positive surgical margins after cystectomy on oncological outcomes: a nationwide study

Affiliations

The impact of positive surgical margins after cystectomy on oncological outcomes: a nationwide study

Jikke Bosveld et al. BJU Int. 2025 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether surgical margin status, alongside existing postoperative risk indicators, improves the identification of bladder cancer patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy following radical cystectomy (RC).

Methods: In this nationwide cohort study, patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) without nodal or distant metastasis (cT2-4aN0/xM0) between November 2017 and December 2020 who underwent RC were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Detailed information on surgical margin status was obtained through linkage with the Dutch central pathology database, Palga. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the independent prognostic effect of positive surgical margins (carcinoma in situ (CIS) only or invasive carcinoma) on PFS and OS.

Results: We identified 1445 MIBC patients treated by RC (53% open, 47% robot-assisted), of whom 135 (9.3%) had positive surgical margins (10.7% in the open and 7.7% in the robot-assisted cohort). In the entire cohort, OS was 79% and 60% at 12 and 48 months after RC, respectively. PFS was 70% and 61% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression showed worse PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-2.72) and OS (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.58-2.58) in patients with surgical margins with invasive carcinoma vs patients with negative margins. Patients with only CIS in the margins also appeared to have worse PFS (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.00-2.58) but these results were not statistically significant. No difference was found for OS (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.80-2.12).

Conclusion: Positive margins should be considered a 'high risk feature', as they result in increased risk of disease progression and impaired survival outcomes. These findings support further investigation of the potential efficacy of adjuvant therapy (i.e., radiotherapy and systemic therapy) among patients with positive surgical margins.

Keywords: adjuvant therapy; muscle‐invasive bladder cancer; overall survival; radical cystectomy; surgical margins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of cohort selection. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for the following reasons: previous chemotherapy for another malignancy, histological variant, treatment of haematuria while cystectomy postponed due to COVID‐19 limitations. NMIBC, non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Observed progression‐free and overall survival of patients stratified by pathological TNM and surgical margin status after radical cystectomy. (A) Observed 24‐month progression‐free survival and (B) 48‐month overall survival stratified by surgical margin status. (C) Observed 24‐month progression‐free survival and (D) 48‐month overall survival stratified by (y)pTN‐stage* and surgical margin status. Four patients had the combination of (y)pTN low risk and positive invasive margins and were omitted from parts C and D because of small group size. *(y)pTN high‐risk: pT3‐4 and/or pN+ without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or ypT2‐4 and/or ypN+ following NAC; (y)pTN low‐risk: all other stages. CIS, carcinoma in situ.

Similar articles

References

    1. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long‐term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 666–675 - PubMed
    1. Dalbagni G, Genega E, Hashibe M et al. Cystectomy for bladder cancer: a contemporary series. J Urol 2001; 165: 1111–1116 - PubMed
    1. Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Albert C et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on muscle‐invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: Summary of the 2023 guidelines. Eur Urol 2023; 85: 17–31 - PubMed
    1. Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta‐analysis Collaboration . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data; advanced bladder cancer (ABC) meta‐analysis collaboration. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 202–205 - PubMed
    1. Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle‐invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 2102–2114 - PMC - PubMed