Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Dec 4;12(12):e010094.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010094.

Plasma arginine as a predictive biomarker for outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer: a correlative analysis of the CCTG CO.26 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Plasma arginine as a predictive biomarker for outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic colorectal cancer: a correlative analysis of the CCTG CO.26 trial

Lucy X Ma et al. J Immunother Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Nutritional stress is a mechanism that allows tumor cells to evade the immune system. Arginine (ARG), an amino acid involved in immunomodulation, aids in regulating T-lymphocyte cell activity and the antitumor response. ARG deficiency in the tumor microenvironment can impair T-cell response while ARG supplementation may promote antitumor immune activity. In this exploratory post hoc analysis of the randomized phase II CO.26 trial, we investigated the role of plasma ARG in predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with microsatellite stable refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods: CO.26 randomized patients with refractory mCRC to durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D+T) versus best supportive care (BSC). Plasma ARG concentrations were determined from pretreatment blood samples using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The median plasma ARG value was used as a cut-off stratifying patients into ARG-high (≥10 700 ng/mL) versus ARG-low (<10 700 ng/mL) groups. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the prognostic and predictive impacts of ARG on OS.

Results: Of 180 patients enrolled in CO.26, 161 (N=114 treated with D+T and 47 BSC) had pretreatment blood samples for ARG analysis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients included in this analysis and the total study patients, or between ARG-high and ARG-low patients. In the BSC arm, the median OS was 3.09 months for ARG-high versus 4.27 months for ARG-low patients (univariable HR 0.89 (0.49-1.65), p=0.72). In the D+T arm, the median OS was 7.62 months for ARG-high versus 5.27 months for ARG-low patients (univariable HR 0.68, (0.48-1.0], p=0.048). In ARG-high patients, D+T significantly improved OS (median OS 7.62 months with D+T vs 3.09 months BSC; HR 0.61 (0.37-0.99), p=0.047; adjusted p=0.042 for interaction). In ARG-low patients there was no OS benefit with D+T (median OS 5.27 months D+T vs 4.27 months BSC; HR 0.87 (0.52-1.46), p=0.61).

Conclusion: High baseline plasma ARG was predictive of improved OS in patients with mCRC treated with D+T. Further investigations are needed to validate ARG as a biomarker. Therapeutic approaches targeting the ARG pathway may augment ICI activity.

Trial registration number: NCT02870920.

Keywords: Biomarker; Colorectal Cancer; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LM: Consulting or Advisory Role—Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb. DJ: Consulting or Advisory Role—AstraZeneca. HFK: Honoraria—Exelixis, Natera; Consulting or Advisory Role—TerSera; Speakers' Bureau—Natera; Research Funding—Exelixis (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst). SB: Consulting or Advisory Role—Amgen, Apobiologix, MDBriefCase, Merck, Taiho Oncology. FC: Consulting or Advisory Role—Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Canada Pharmaceuticals. JRG: Honoraria—AstraZeneca; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses—AstraZeneca. PK: Consulting or Advisory Role—Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Canada, Taiho Pharmaceutical. BS: Honoraria—AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical; Consulting or Advisory Role—AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical. FA: Consulting or Advisory Role—Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Incyte, Merck, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical; Speakers’ Bureau—Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb Canada, Merck, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical. Research Funding—Bristol Myers Squibb/Medarex (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Merck (Inst), Novartis (Inst). JML: Consulting or Advisory Role—Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, Bayer, Ipsen, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical; Research Funding—Amgen (Inst), Ipsen (Inst). EC: Honoraria—AstraZeneca Canada, Bayer, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche; Research Funding—1Globe Health Institute, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, NuBiyota, Repare Therapeutics, Roche Canada.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. OS for patients treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D+T) versus best supportive care (BSC) stratified by baseline plasma arginine (ARG). OS, overall survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plasma arginine versus OS for patients treated with BSC (left) or D+T (right). BSC, best supportive care; D+T, durvalumab plus tremelimumab; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1535–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910836. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1823–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1277–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abou-Alfa GK, Lau G, Kudo M, et al. Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022;1 doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100070. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data