Recurrent Outbreak of Carbapenem-Resistant IMP-1-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Impact of Prolonged Patient Colonization
- PMID: 39632684
- DOI: 10.1111/tid.14414
Recurrent Outbreak of Carbapenem-Resistant IMP-1-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Impact of Prolonged Patient Colonization
Abstract
Background: Infections by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) have been associated with high morbidity and mortality among solid organ recipients.
Objectives: To delineate the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of a recurrent outbreak of imipenem (IMP)-producing P. aeruginosa (CRPA) among kidney transplant (KT) recipient METHODS: We described a recurring CRPA outbreak in a KT ward, divided into two periods: before unit closure (Feb 2019-2020) and after reopening (Aug 2020-Dec 2023). Routine surveillance cultures (SCs) were performed using axillary-perineum-rectal swabs with immunochromatographic tests. A case-control study identified risk factors for CRPA acquisition. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole genome sequencing characterized the strains.
Results: After reopening, new cases arose from patients previously colonized, peaking 18 months later. A total of 67 KT recipients with CRPA-IMP-producing strains were identified. All except one sequenced strain belonged to the ST446 clone, differing by a maximum of 110 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Forty-five (67.2%) cases were identified through SC, with 45.7% showing intermittent SC positivity. Patients remained colonized for up to 623 days. Twenty-four (35.8%) patients had infections, with the most common site being the urinary tract. Identified risk factors included older age, deceased donor, re-transplantation, reoperation, carbapenem or quinolone use, lymphopenia, hospital stay >10 days, and the first 60 days post-KT.
Conclusion: KT recipients can harbor CRPA for extended periods, and detecting CRPA-colonized patients is challenging. These characteristics highlight the patient as the major source and a critical point in outbreak control.
Keywords: carbapenemase; colonization; cross‐transmission; multidrug‐resistance; re‐transplantation; urinary infection.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- M. P. Freire, S. Pouch, A. Manesh, and M. Giannella, “Burden and Management of Multi‐Drug Resistant Organism Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients across the World: A Narrative Review,” Transplant International 37 (2024): 12469, https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12469.
-
- A. Geladari, T. Karampatakis, C. Antachopoulos, et al., “Epidemiological Surveillance of Multidrug‐Resistant Gram‐Negative Bacteria in a Solid Organ Transplantation Department,” Transplant Infectious Disease: An Official Journal of the Transplantation Society 19 (2017): 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12686.
-
- T. Liu, Y. Zhang, and Q. Wan, “Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia Among Liver Transplant Recipients,” Infection and Drug Resistance 11 (2018): 2345–2356, https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S180283.
-
- C. van Delden, S. Stampf, H. H. Hirsch, et al., “Burden and Timeline of Infectious Diseases in the First Year after Solid Organ Transplantation in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 71 (2020): e159–69, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1113.
-
- M. W. Adelman, A. A. Connor, E. Hsu, et al., “Bloodstream Infections After Solid Organ Transplantation: Clinical Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance (2016–21),” JAC‐Antimicrobial Resistance 6 (2023): dlad158, https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad158.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 402158/2021-0/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- 444395/2023-7/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- 402470/2018-4/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- 2020/06157-2/Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- 2017/50333-7/Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
