Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30185.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80148-0.

Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and open approaches for right anterior sectionectomy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and open approaches for right anterior sectionectomy

Wen Li et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Laparoscopic hepatectomy has minimally invasive advantages, but reports on laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy (LRAS) are rare. Herein, we try to explore the benefits and drawbacks of LRAS by comparing it with open right anterior sectionectomy (ORAS). Between January 2015 and September 2023, 39 patients who underwent LRAS (n = 18) or ORAS (n = 21) were enrolled in the study. The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. No significant differences in the preoperative data were observed between the two groups. The LRAS group had significantly lesser blood loss (P = 0.019), a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.045), and a higher rate of bile leak (P = 0.039) than the ORAS group. There was no significant difference in the operative time (P = 0.156), transfusion rate (P = 0.385), hospital expenses (P = 0.511), rate of other complications, postoperative white blood cell count, and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). Beside, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.351) or overall survival (P = 0.613) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma between the two groups. LRAS is a safe and feasible surgical procedure. It may be preferred for lesions in the right anterior lobe of the liver.

Keywords: Hepatectomy; Laparoscopic; Liver; Right anterior lobe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Surgical steps of LRAS. (A) Gallbladder removal. (B) The hepatic portal vein was blocked with a strap. (C) The Glissonean pedicle of the right anterior lobe was dissected. (D) The hepatic ischemic line of the right anterior lobe. (E) The middle hepatic vein branches of the V and VIII segments were severed. (F) The parenchyma was transected to identify the terminal portion of the RHV. (G) The hepatic vein branches of the RHV were ligated and severed. (H) The Glissonean pedicle of the right anterior lobe was severed. (I) MHV and RHV were exposed on the liver section after LRAS. LRAS, laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy; RHV, right hepatic vein; MHV, middle hepatic vein.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Preoperative 3D reconstruction of the left hepatic duct and MHV. (A) Anterior, (B) posterior, (C) superior, (D) inferior, and (E,F) right- and left-side views. 3D, three-dimensional; MHV, middle hepatic vein.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Radiological images of a representative patient underwent LRAS. (A,B,C) Preoperative MRI. (D) CT obtained 1 week after the surgery.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The survival curve between the LRAS and ORAS groups. (A) overall survival. (B) the disease-free survival.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jeong, J. S., Gwak, M. S., Kim, G. S., Ko, J. S. et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between pure laparoscopic surgery and open right hepatectomy in living donor hepatectomy: propensity score matching analysis. Sci. Rep.10, 5314 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yukiyasu Okamura, Y. et al. Novel patient risk factors and validation of a difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy. Sci. Rep. Volume. 9, 17653 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abu Hilal, M. et al. Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg. Endosc. 27, 2542–2550 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Nguyen, K. T., Gamblin, T. C. & Geller, D. A. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann. Surg.250, 831–841 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Dagher, I. et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann. Surg.250, 856–860 (2009). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources