Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and open approaches for right anterior sectionectomy
- PMID: 39632910
- PMCID: PMC11618377
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80148-0
Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and open approaches for right anterior sectionectomy
Abstract
Laparoscopic hepatectomy has minimally invasive advantages, but reports on laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy (LRAS) are rare. Herein, we try to explore the benefits and drawbacks of LRAS by comparing it with open right anterior sectionectomy (ORAS). Between January 2015 and September 2023, 39 patients who underwent LRAS (n = 18) or ORAS (n = 21) were enrolled in the study. The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. No significant differences in the preoperative data were observed between the two groups. The LRAS group had significantly lesser blood loss (P = 0.019), a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.045), and a higher rate of bile leak (P = 0.039) than the ORAS group. There was no significant difference in the operative time (P = 0.156), transfusion rate (P = 0.385), hospital expenses (P = 0.511), rate of other complications, postoperative white blood cell count, and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). Beside, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.351) or overall survival (P = 0.613) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma between the two groups. LRAS is a safe and feasible surgical procedure. It may be preferred for lesions in the right anterior lobe of the liver.
Keywords: Hepatectomy; Laparoscopic; Liver; Right anterior lobe.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Technology in Right Posterior Sectionectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Apr;30(2):169-172. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000772. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020. PMID: 32080023
-
Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Dec 1;34(6):614-618. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001330. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024. PMID: 39434213
-
Stapleless laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the Louisville statement by a young liver surgeon.BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 28;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0903-y. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30486797 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic vs. open left lateral sectionectomy: An update meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.Int J Surg. 2019 Jan;61:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.021. Epub 2018 Nov 27. Int J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30496866 Review.
-
Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: What Are the Advantages in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Personal Experience.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Oct;30(10):1054-1065. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0408. Epub 2020 Jul 20. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020. PMID: 32707003
References
-
- Abu Hilal, M. et al. Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg. Endosc. 27, 2542–2550 (2013). - PubMed
-
- Nguyen, K. T., Gamblin, T. C. & Geller, D. A. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann. Surg.250, 831–841 (2009). - PubMed
-
- Dagher, I. et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann. Surg.250, 856–860 (2009). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical