Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse
- PMID: 3963307
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90110-8
Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse
Abstract
We studied 27 patients with rectal prolapse (7 men and 20 women). Eight patients were continent, 8 were partially incontinent, and 11 were totally incontinent. Perineal descent and an absent anocutaneous reflex were common findings, implying damage to the external anal sphincter and the pelvic floor muscles. Both partially and totally incontinent patients had significantly lower basal and voluntary contraction pressures compared with those of control subjects, which is in accordance with previous reports on the subject. Our continent patients had normal voluntary contraction pressures, but basal pressures were lower than those of the control subjects (p less than 0.02). This suggests that there may be dysfunction of the internal anal sphincter before the development of clinical symptoms of incontinence. The internal anal sphincter reflex was present in 19 patients (70 percent). It was absent in patients with very little tone of the anal canal. It seems that absence of the internal anal sphincter reflex is not invariably connected with rectal prolapse. The results of this study indicate that rectal prolapse is often associated with dysfunction of the anal sphincters, leading to incontinence.
Similar articles
-
Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals.Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1998 Nov;90(11):794-805. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1998. PMID: 9866412 English, Spanish.
-
Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study.Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Mar;34(3):209-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02090159. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991. PMID: 1999126
-
Influence of rectal prolapse on the asymmetry of the anal sphincter in patients with anal incontinence.BMC Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug 19;3:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-3-23. BMC Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12925237 Free PMC article.
-
[Anal tone: Physiology, clinical and instrumental characteristics].Prog Urol. 2020 Sep;30(11):588-596. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jul 4. Prog Urol. 2020. PMID: 32636059 French.
-
Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Medical Management of Rectal Prolapse.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Feb;30(1):16-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593431. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017. PMID: 28144208 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Faecal incontinence in adults.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Aug 10;8(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00381-7. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022. PMID: 35948559 Review.
-
Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992 Dec;7(4):219-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00341225. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992. PMID: 1338091 Clinical Trial.
-
Rectal prolapse.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Mar;22(3):231-43. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0198-2. Epub 2006 Oct 5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007. Retraction in: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Dec;22(12):1561. PMID: 17021747 Retracted. Review.
-
Comparison of recall and daily self-report of fecal incontinence severity.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 Sep-Oct;35(5):515-20. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000335964.13855.8d. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18794704 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between a new electronic bidet and conventional sitz baths: a manometric evaluation of the anal resting pressure in normal healthy volunteers.Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Sep;19(9):535-40. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1350-1. Epub 2015 Jul 30. Tech Coloproctol. 2015. PMID: 26223798
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical