Occipital condyle fractures revisited
- PMID: 39633150
- DOI: 10.1007/s10140-024-02303-4
Occipital condyle fractures revisited
Abstract
Purpose: Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) are classified by the Anderson and Montesano system into Type I (comminuted, minimally displaced), Type II (stable, associated with basilar skull fractures), and Type III (unstable avulsion fractures). We retrospectively analyzed 24,986 cervical spine CT examinations of emergency department patients over five years to determine the incidence and characteristics of OCFs, mechanism of injury, and associated intracranial and cervical spine injuries.
Methods and materials: The study was IRB-approved and HIPAA compliant. We retrospectively reviewed the CT brain and CT cervical spine reports performed from July 2018 to August 2023. Variables collected included age, sex, clinical presentation, coincident brain and cervical spine injuries, treatments, and OCF classifications.
Results: Sixty-three of 24,986 patients (0.25%) had OCFs, predominantly male (41 males, 22 females), with an average age of 51.1 years; 22/63 (34.9%) occurred in asymptomatic patients. Concurrent injuries included cervical spine fractures (33.3%) at C1 and C2 and intracranial injuries (47.6%), mostly subarachnoid and subdural hemorrhages. OCFs were categorized into Anderson-Montesano Type I (9 cases), Type II (24 cases), and Type III (30 cases), with unstable Type III fractures more common in MVC victims; stable fractures had higher rates of intracranial injuries. There were no significant differences in morbidity, mortality, or concurrent cervical spine or chest/abdominal/pelvic findings between stable and unstable OCFs.
Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of comprehensive imaging and evaluation in trauma cases to identify OCFs, even in asymptomatic patients, with a high rate of concurrent C1-2 and intracranial injuries.
Clinical relevance/application: Being aware of occipital condyle fractures, types, and complications is important in the emergency radiology evaluation of trauma patients, especially given high rates of C1-2 fractures and intracranial bleeds.
Keywords: Brain; Cervical spine; Fracture; Occipital condyle; Trauma.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Management of Type III Occipital Condyle Fractures.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 15;13(24):7639. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247639. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39768563 Free PMC article.
-
Occipital Condyle Fractures and Concomitant Cervical Spine Fractures: Implications for Management.World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e238-e243. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Apr 12. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29656152
-
Evaluation of using the Anderson-Montesano and the Tuli classifications in pediatric patients with occipital condyle fractures.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 13;16(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02463-w. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34256792 Free PMC article.
-
Occipital condyle fractures.Neurosurgery. 1997 Aug;41(2):368-76; discussion 376-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199708000-00006. Neurosurgery. 1997. PMID: 9257304 Review.
-
Occipital condylar fractures: a review.Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):635-44. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se23635. Radiology. 2000. PMID: 10966689 Review.
References
-
- Bell C Surgical observations. 1817
-
- Tuli S, Tator C, Fehlings M, Mackay M (1997) Occipital Condyle Fractures Neurosurg 41(2):368–377
-
- Mueller FJ, Fuechtmeier B, Kinner B, Rosskopf M, Neumann C, Nerlich M, Englert C (2012) Occipital condyle fractures. Prospective follow-up of 31 cases within 5 years at a level 1 trauma centre. Eur Spine J 21(2):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1963-7 Epub 2011 Aug 11. PMID: 21833573; PMCID: PMC3265598 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous