The relative risk of clinically relevant cholelithiasis among glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, real-world study
- PMID: 39633496
- PMCID: PMC11616335
- DOI: 10.1186/s13098-024-01526-2
The relative risk of clinically relevant cholelithiasis among glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, real-world study
Abstract
Background and aim: The association between biliary disorders with weight reduction enhanced by GLP-1RAs was observed frequently, nevertheless, the relative risk of the clinically relevant cholelithiasis was not specified clearly among different GLP-1RAs.
Methods: 308 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) were recruited and divided into 4 groups; liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, versus control group; comprised of 69, 76, 71, and 92, respectively. Clinical history, examination, laboratory, and radiology tests were implemented.
Results: Cholelithiasis significantly associates GLP1-RAs (p = 0.033). Overall cholelithiasis was evident in 31.2% of our participants. Symptomatic cholelithiasis prevails in 60.4% of patients with cholelithiasis. Symptomatic complicated cholelithiasis prevailed in 33.3%; distributed in 28.1%, 28.1%, 21.9%, and 21.9% in liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and control groups, respectively. Meanwhile, symptomatic uncomplicated cholelithiasis was observed in 27.1%; distributed in 34.6%, 30.8%, 15.4%, and 19.2% in Liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and control groups, respectively. Asymptomatic cholelithiasis was noted in 36.8%, 21.1%, 10.5%, and 31.6% of patients with dulaglutide, semaglutide, liraglutide, and control groups, respectively. Specifically, 81.1%, 68%, and 44% of patients with liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide experienced symptomatic cholelithiasis. The relative risk of cholelithiasis was 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 in liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide with number needed to harm of 17.25, 14.69, and 10.96, respectively. The relative risk of symptomatic cholelithiasis was 1.6, 0.9, and 1.4 in liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide with number needed to harm of 3.14, 16.67, and 5.56, respectively.
Conclusion: Liraglutide was associated with the highest risk of clinically relevant cholelithiasis than semaglutide, and dulaglutide in patients with T2D.
Keywords: Biliary; Cholelithiasis; GLP1-receptor agonists; Relevant; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research committee of Mansoura University with approval code (No. R.22.10. 1897.R1) and with the IRB committee, Al Yousif Hospital, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia, (AYH IRB: 02/03/2023). All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and later versions.Written informed consent was approved by the IRB and signed by all participants before enrolment. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Smits MM, van Raalte DH, Tonneijck L, Muskiet MHA, Kramer MHH, Cahen DL. GLP-1 based therapies: clinical implications for gastroenterologists. Gut. 2016;65(4):702–11. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310572. (Epub 2016 Jan 19). - PubMed
-
- Gether IM, Nexøe-Larsen C, Knop FK. New Avenues in the regulation of gallbladder motility-implications for the use of glucagon-like peptide-derived drugs. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(7):2463–72. 10.1210/jc.2018-01008. - PubMed
-
- Cooperberg PL, Burhenne HJ. Real-time ultrasonography diagnostic technique of choice in calculous gallbladder disease. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:1277–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
