Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 20:14:1460426.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1460426. eCollection 2024.

A clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI for predicting the outcome of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy

Affiliations

A clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI for predicting the outcome of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy

Liucheng Chen et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Problem: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common malignant tumor with high heterogeneity and is mainly treated with chemoradiotherapy. It is important to predict the outcome of patients with advanced NPC after chemoradiotherapy to devise customized treatment strategies. Traditional MRI methods have limited predictive power, and better predictive models are needed.

Aim: To evaluate the predictive value of a clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI in predicting the outcome of advanced NPC patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: This prospective study included a retrospective analysis of 118 patients with advanced NPC who underwent MRI prior to chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The maximum ROIs of lesions at the same level were determined via axial T2-weighted imaging short-time inversion recovery (T2WI-STIR), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with solid tumor components, and the radiomic features were extracted. After feature selection, the radiomics score was calculated, and a nomogram was constructed combining the radiomics score with the clinical features. The diagnostic efficacy of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the clinical application value of the nomogram was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA) and a correction curve. Patients were divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group, and the median risk score calculated by the joint prediction model was used as the cutoff value. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare the differences in survival curves between the two groups.

Results: The AUCs of the nomogram model constructed by the combination of the radiomics score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and T stage in the training group and validation group were 0.897 (95% CI: 0.825-0.968) and 0.801 (95% CI: 0.673-0.929), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the model effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups, with significant differences in prognosis.

Conclusion: This clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI offers a noninvasive, effective tool for predicting the outcome of advanced NPC patients receiving chemoradiotherapy, promoting individualized treatment approaches.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; nomogram; radiomics; survival models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Manual outline of the ROI schematic at the maximum tumor level. (A–C): Results of manual lesion segmentation on T2WI-STIR, CE-T1WI and DWI images, left to right.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Six radiomic features were screened via the LASSO regression model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curves for the 3 models in the training group and validation group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy is predicted. Note: T stage—1 represents T3–T4, and 0 represents T1–T2.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Calibration curves of the training group and validation group with columns.
Figure 7
Figure 7
DCA curves of the training group and verification group.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Survival curve of the combined model.

Similar articles

References

    1. Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. (2019) 394:64–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohammed MA, Ghani MKA, Hamed RI, Ibrahim DA. Analysis of an electronic methods for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Prevalence, diagnosis, challenges and technologies. J Comput Sci. (2017) 21:241–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.04.006 - DOI
    1. Pan JJ, Ng WT, Zong JF, Chan LL, O’Sullivan B, Lin SJ, et al. . Proposal for the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer. (2016) 122:546–58. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29795 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ, Xie FY, et al. . Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. (2016) 17:1509–20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources