The impact of ultra-processed foods and unprocessed or minimally processed foods on the quality of life among adolescents: a longitudinal study from China
- PMID: 39634553
- PMCID: PMC11614671
- DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1489067
The impact of ultra-processed foods and unprocessed or minimally processed foods on the quality of life among adolescents: a longitudinal study from China
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between ultra-processed foods (UPF), unprocessed or minimally processed foods (UMFs) with the quality of life (QoL) in Chinese adolescents.
Methods: The study included a baseline survey in 2021 (T1) and a follow-up survey in 2022 (T2), with a total of 3,206 participants, including 1,510 males (Age ± SE: 13.62 ± 1.69) and 1,696 females (Age ± SE: 14.09 ± 1.85). QoL was measured using the Quality of Life Scale for Children and Adolescents. All adolescents were asked to recall the foods they had eaten in the past week, which was classified using the NOVA system.
Results: Instant noodles, sugary drinks, and fried foods had a negative impact on adolescents' QoL. Snacks or desserts only had a negative impact on the girls' QoL. However, processed meats had a positive impact on the QoL of all adolescents. Fast food was beneficial for girls' QoL. Fruits had a positive impact on the QoL of all adolescents. Green leafy vegetables, red and orange vegetables, fish, shrimp, or other seafood had a positive impact on the QoL of girls. Fresh poultry, pork, beef, and other meats had a positive impact on boys' QoL. Soy products were detrimental to girls' QoL. Tubers had a negative impact on boys' QoL. Potatoes had a negative effect on the all adolescents' QoL.
Discussion: This study further expands the understanding of the relationship between UPF, UMFs, and QoL. It provides new insights and evidence for improving the QoL of adolescents.
Keywords: Chinese adolescents; fixed effects model; gender difference; quality of life; ultra-processed foods; unprocessed or minimally processed foods.
Copyright © 2024 Yang, Gao, Yi, Hu, Zhao, Chen, Sui, Zhang and Ma.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Consumption of Ultra-Processed Food and Drink Products in a Greek Christian Orthodox Church Fasting Population.Nutrients. 2023 Nov 24;15(23):4907. doi: 10.3390/nu15234907. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 38068765 Free PMC article.
-
Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium.Eur J Nutr. 2019 Dec;58(8):3267-3278. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1870-3. Epub 2018 Dec 3. Eur J Nutr. 2019. PMID: 30511164
-
Evaluation of foods, drinks and diets in the Netherlands according to the degree of processing for nutritional quality, environmental impact and food costs.BMC Public Health. 2022 May 3;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13282-x. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35501799 Free PMC article.
-
Heavy Metals in Unprocessed or Minimally Processed Foods Consumed by Humans Worldwide: A Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;19(14):8651. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148651. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35886506 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in India: a formative research study.BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):2212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19624-1. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39143524 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization (2024) WHOQOL-measuring quality of life. Available at: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol (accessed august 13, 2024).
-
- Global nutrition targets (2025) Stunting policy brief. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-14.3 (accessed august 11, 2024).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous