Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2025 Jun;35(6):3429-3431.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11226-0. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

Avoiding Boeing 737 Max moments: ideal versus real radiology AI assessment

J Raymond Geis  1   2
Affiliations
Editorial

Avoiding Boeing 737 Max moments: ideal versus real radiology AI assessment

J Raymond Geis. Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is J. Raymond Geis. Conflict of interest: The author of this manuscript declares relationships with the following companies: Innosphere Ventures—Advisor, Innosphere Ventures Fund—Chief Technical Advisor, Investor. Statistics and biometry: No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Informed consent: Written informed consent was not required. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was not required. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: Not applicable. Methodology: Commentary

Comment on

References

    1. Kemper EHM, Erenstein H, Boverhof BJ et al (2024) ESR Essentials: how to get to valuable radiology AI: the role of early health technology assessment—practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11188-3
    1. Boverhof BJ, Redekop WK, Bos D et al (2004) Radiology AI Deployment and Assessment Rubric (RADAR) to bring value-based AI into radiological practice. Insights Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01599-z
    1. Lampe K, Mäkelä M, Garrido MV et al (2009) The HTA core model: a novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462309990638
    1. Di Ruffano LF, Harris IM, Zhelev Z et al (2023) Health technology assessment of diagnostic tests: a state of the art review of methods guidance from international organisations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462323000065
    1. European Commission (2021) Regulation on health technology assessment—European Commission. Accessed 22 Sept 2024 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/2282/oj

LinkOut - more resources