Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0301748.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301748. eCollection 2024.

Healthcare providers' perceptions on post abortion intrauterine contraception: A qualitative study in central Uganda

Affiliations

Healthcare providers' perceptions on post abortion intrauterine contraception: A qualitative study in central Uganda

Herbert Kayiga et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Despite access to post abortion intrauterine contraception, the uptake of Intrauterine devices (IUDs) in Uganda remains low. Whether the perceptions of healthcare providers towards IUDs have a role in the provision of post abortion IUDs remains unclear. We explored perceptions on post abortion IUD provision among healthcare providers in Uganda, focusing on barriers and facilitators in regards to provision and uptake.

Methods: Between 1st August 2022 and 30th September 2022, forty-five in-depth interviews were conducted among healthcare providers of different cadres at sixteen public health facilities in central Uganda. We used the case study design to explore the healthcare providers' perceptions. The interviews were primarily to help us understand the perceptions of healthcare providers towards IUDs. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Themes were identified using the conventional inductive content analysis.

Results: From the analysis, three themes emerged. Theme one covered health system related barriers in regards to IUD provision such as healthcare providers' and health facility challenges. The second theme focused on the challenges in post abortion contraceptive counselling focusing on IUDs. The third theme covered the motivating factors and participants' views on how to scale up IUD uptake and provision within post abortion care in Uganda. We found that lack of appropriate knowledge and skills on IUD provision, and heavy workloads, negatively impacted IUD provision. Inadequate facilities, IUD stock-outs, and minimal community sensitization also limited the utilization of IUDs. Furthermore, language barriers, community misconceptions around IUDs, long travel distances to the health facility, and partner refusal, contributed to the low uptake of post abortion IUDs. To address the identified barriers and scale up post abortion IUD provision, participants recommended addressing health system barriers, regular in-service refresher trainings, mentoring and supervision. They emphasized the importance of addressing contraceptive misconceptions and men's opposition to IUDs through community sensitization.

Conclusion: In this study we identified several barriers to post abortion IUD provision, highlighting an urgent need to address health system barriers including healthcare providers' skills and knowledge gaps, supply chain challenges, and to ensure that facilities are conducive to quality contraceptive counselling. Provision of on-job refresher trainings, mentoring and supervision, are key motivators that can be utilized in supporting healthcare providers towards post abortion IUD provision. To further increase uptake, efforts are needed to dispel contraceptive myths and misconceptions at the community level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller AB, Tunçalp Ö, Beavin C., Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. The Lancet Global Health, 2020. 8(9): p. e1152–e1161. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)., Ten great public health achievements—United States., 1900–1999. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 1999. 48(12): p. 241–243. - PubMed
    1. Wulifan JK, Brenner S, Jahn A, De Allegri M., A scoping review on determinants of unmet need for family planning among women of reproductive age in low and middle income countries. BMC women’s health, 2015. 16: p. 1–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Shah IH, Åhman E, Henshaw SK, Bankole., Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. The lancet, 2012. 379(9816): p. 625–632. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ǻhman E. and Shah I.H., New estimates and trends regarding unsafe abortion mortality. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2011. 115(2): p. 121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.05.027 - DOI - PubMed