Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1986;7(1):1-20.
doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(86)90014-7.

Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through transfer of stimulus control procedures

Case Reports

Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through transfer of stimulus control procedures

M C Luciano. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1986.

Abstract

The acquisition of productive intraverbal behavior involving the emission of thematically related responses was evaluated. Three mentally retarded children participated in this study and a multiple-probe design was used in training productive intraverbal behavior (three stimulus classes). Training was conducted using an errorless discrimination procedure (prompt delay) and a variation of this to transfer vocal responses from control of visual stimuli (tact behavior) to verbal stimuli (intraverbal behavior). Reinforcement probability was equal for correct responses prior to and following a prompt and incorrect responses were ignored. Acquisition criteria were reached when subjects emitted 80-100% correct responses and more than four different responses per session during three consecutive sessions. These criteria were achieved in all three subjects. Prompt delay procedure produced no incorrect responses, decreased acquisition criteria slightly over time, produced responses generalization during training, and increased comprehensive intraverbal behavior after training productive intraverbals. Variations in prompt delay procedure produced the same results except a low rate of errors and chaining of different responses per trial appeared when an additional prompt was implemented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types