Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):798.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04929-2.

Effects of different supervised and structured physical exercise on the physical fitness trainability of children and adolescents: a meta-analysis and meta-regression : Physical fitness trainability in children and adolescents' health

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of different supervised and structured physical exercise on the physical fitness trainability of children and adolescents: a meta-analysis and meta-regression : Physical fitness trainability in children and adolescents' health

Carolina Dertzbocher Feil Pinho et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Physical fitness has been considered an important health indicator. Several factors can impact the increase in physical fitness in children and adolescents, including chronological age, sex and BMI, in addition to training variables such as weekly frequency, session and intervention duration, and types of exercises performed. To know the importance of variables that can impact physical fitness, it is important for health professionals to identify the most efficient way of prescribing physical exercises for children and adolescents. The aim is review and meta-analyses of the effects of supervised and structured physical exercise on the physical fitness trainability of children and adolescents.

Methods: Relevant articles were searched in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Scopus platform databases and selected based on the following criteria: children and adolescents aged between 7 and 17 years who performed any type of structured physical exercise compared to a control group without exercise and evaluating physical fitness (strength or muscular power, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) or speed. The results are reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020.

Results: Eighty studies were included with a total of 5769 participants. Strength exercises (ES: 1.073; 95% CI, 0.612-1.533; P < 0.001; I2: 74%), concurrent (ES: 1.054; 95% CI, 0.255-1.853; P < 0.010; I2: 72%) and sports (ES: 0.573; 95% CI, 0.015 to 1.132; P < 0.044; I2: 34%) seem to be the most effective in increasing muscular strength. Aerobic activities (ES: 0.400; 95% CI, 0.258-0.542; P < 0.001; I2: 74%), sports (ES: 0.271; 95% IC, 0.148-0.394; P < 0.001; I2: 15), or HIIT (ES: 0.668; 95% IC, 0.333-1.003; P < 0.001; I2: 29%) resulted in increased CRF (ES: 0.514; 95% IC, 0.220-1.808; P < 0.001; I2: 66%). The practice of physical exercise increased muscular power (ES: 0.241; 95% CI, 0.053-0.429; P = 0.012; I2: 0%). The practice of HIIT impacts MAS gains (ES: 0.048; 95% CI, 0.050 - 0.026; P = 0.029; I2: 44%).

Conclusion: Supervised and structured physical exercise can improve muscular strength (15-35%), CRF (5.4-8.5%), muscular power (5.6-11.8%), and MAS (5.4%) trainability in children and adolescents. Sex, BMI of the subjects and type of exercise performed (aerobic activities, exclusive to strength, HIIT or sports) should be considered when prescribing the exercise.

Keywords: Cardiorespiratory fitness; Maximal aerobic speed; Muscular power; Muscular strength; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the number of articles retrieved during the literature search and study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standardized mean differences of “MF – muscular strength” in the intervention versus control groups (no intervention) Note: CI: confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Standardized mean differences in CRF between the intervention and control groups (no intervention) Note: CI: confidence interval
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Standardized mean differences of “MF – muscular power” in intervention versus control (no intervention) Note: CI: confidence interval
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Standardized mean differences in maximal aerobic speed in the intervention versus the control (no intervention) Note: CI: confidence interval

References

    1. Lang JJ, Zhang K, Agostinis-Sobrinho C, Andersen LB, Basterfield L, Berglind D, et al. Top 10 international priorities for physical fitness research and surveillance among children and adolescents: a twin-panel Delphi study. Sports Med. 2022. 10.1007/s40279-022-01752-6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen JR, Natvig GK, Aadland E, Moe VF, Kolotkin RL, Anderssen SA, et al. Associations between health-related quality of life, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, physical activity and waist circumference in 10-year-old children: the ASK study. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:3421–8. 10.1007/s11136-017-1634-1 - PubMed
    1. Cadenas-Sanchez C, Migueles JH, Esteban-Cornejo I, Mora-Gonzalez J, Henriksson P, Rodriguez-Ayllon M, et al. Fitness, physical activity and academic achievement in overweight/obese children. J Sports Sci. 2020;38:731–40. 10.1080/02640414.2020.1729516 - PubMed
    1. de Lima TR, Martins PC, Moreno YMF, Chaput JP, Tremblay MS, Sui X, et al. Muscular fitness and cardiometabolic variables in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2022;52:1555–75. 10.1007/s40279-021-01631-6 - PubMed
    1. Henriques-Neto D, Magalhães JP, Hetherington-Rauth M, Santos DA, Baptista F, Sardinha LB. Physical fitness and bone health in young athletes and nonathletes. Sports Health. 2020;12:441–8. 10.1177/1941738120931755 - PMC - PubMed