Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 5;25(1):997.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08116-3.

Patient perspectives on low back pain treatment in primary care: a qualitative study of hopes, expectations, and experiences

Simon Dyrløv Madsen  1   2   3 , Mette Jensen Stochkendahl  4   5 , Lars Morsø  6   7 , Merethe Kirstine Andersen  8 , Elisabeth Assing Hvidt  8
Affiliations

Patient perspectives on low back pain treatment in primary care: a qualitative study of hopes, expectations, and experiences

Simon Dyrløv Madsen et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Patients' hopes and expectations for low back pain treatment influence their consultation experiences and treatment outcomes. These hopes and expectations may evolve over time, potentially leading to a shift in what patients consider important before and after a consultation. Understanding the distinction between hopes and expectations, and how they evolve is important for improving patient care. This study explored patients' hopes and expectations prior to LBP consultations and examined how these were reflected in their post-consultation experiences.

Methods: We employed a qualitative design consisting of individual semi-structured pre- and post-consultation interviews with patients seeking care for low back pain from general practitioners, physiotherapists, and chiropractors in Denmark. A convenience sample of 18 patients (10 females and 8 males) aged between 28 and 79 years were interviewed about their hopes and expectations before a consultation and their experiences immediately following the consultation. Data were analysed employing Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis.

Results: Two themes with five subthemes were developed: (1) "Something needs to be done," which included subthemes related to life disruption, expectations of clinical assessment, and the clinicians as experts; and (2) "Experiences and emotional responses to the interaction with the clinician", highlighting the importance of trust and the personal attributes of clinicians. Patients initially sought urgent help and clarity regarding their condition but shifted their focus post-consultation to the relational dynamics and emotional engagement experienced during interactions with clinicians.

Conclusions: This study contributes to the understanding of how patients' hopes and expectations regarding low back pain consultations evolve, shifting from a focus on clinical actions and outcomes to valuing interpersonal relationships and emotional support from clinicians. Recognising these shifts can enhance clinician-patient interactions and improve overall patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Keywords: Expectations; Experiences; Hopes; Interview; Low back pain; Primary healthcare; Qualitative; Thematic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The authorised legal department at the University of Southern Denmark approved the study (ID #11.226). The Regional Ethics Committee confirmed no ethical approval was required (file no. 20222000-11). Patients gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Cleland JA. Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain. Phys Ther. 2010;90(9):1345–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF, O’Halloran P. Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):25–40. - PubMed
    1. Eklund A, De Carvalho D, Pagé I, Wong A, Johansson MS, Pohlman KA, et al. Expectations influence treatment outcomes in patients with low back pain. A secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(7):1378–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop MD, Bialosky JE, Cleland JA. Patient expectations of benefit from common interventions for low back pain and effects on outcome: secondary analysis of a clinical trial of manual therapy interventions. J Man Manip Ther. 2011;19(1):20–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. Decade of the flags working G. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (yellow flags) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–53. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources