Public health, policy, and clinical interventions to improve perinatal care for migrant women and infants in high-income countries: a systematic review
- PMID: 39640929
- PMCID: PMC11617313
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102938
Public health, policy, and clinical interventions to improve perinatal care for migrant women and infants in high-income countries: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Migrant women who are pregnant or postpartum and their infants are often at increased risk of poorer perinatal outcomes compared to host country populations. This review aimed to identify public health, policy, and clinical interventions to improve maternity care for migrant women and their infants in high-income countries (HICs).
Methods: In this systematic review we searched EMBASE, EMCARE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and grey literature from inception to 13th March 2024, with no language or date restrictions (PROSPERO: CRD42022380678). Interventional and observational studies assessing the effectiveness of any intervention to improve perinatal care for migrant women and their infants in HICs delivered in the pregnancy, peripartum, or postpartum period (up to one year after birth) were included. Quantitative outcomes were extracted. Qualitative studies were excluded. The main outcomes of interest were preterm birth, birthweight, and appointment attendance. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using Harvest plots and binomial exact calculations.
Findings: 15,689 records were retrieved, 29 studies comprising data from 16,763,837 women were included. 22 studies (75.9%) included multiple interventions. Five interventions had strong evidence of effectiveness. Two clinical interventions: 100.0% of studies including specialist multidisciplinary teams improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest, namely preterm birth, birthweight, and appointment attendance (95% confidence interval 73.5-100.0%; p < 0.001); and 90.9% of studies including specialist in-person interpreting improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest (58.7-100.0%; p = 0.012). Three public health or policy interventions: 100.0% of social welfare interventions (75.3%-100.0%; p < 0.001) improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest; 100.0% of maternal education interventions (71.5-100.0%. p < 0.001), and 83.3% of studies assessing access to free healthcare (51.6-97.9%; p = 0.039).
Interpretation: The findings suggest that multicomponent interventions comprising multidisciplinary teams, in-person interpreting, maternal education, and social welfare support can improve perinatal outcomes for migrant women and their infants. Removing financial barriers to care may improve perinatal outcomes and be cost saving to healthcare systems. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given that most included studies were of poor quality and that sensitivity analysis restricting to interventional studies only did not demonstrate any effect on the main outcomes of interest.
Funding: KS is supported by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellowship (NIHR302577). HRJ is supported by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR303183). HRJ is supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London. MM is supported by a Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship (Grant number MR/W01498X/1). GF is supported by a Nuffield Department of Population Health Clinical Research Fellowship. MK is an NIHR Senior Investigator (NIHR303806). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Keywords: Health policy; Obstetrics; Paediatrics; Public health.
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
SL is a fellow of Pathway, a UK charity which provides and advocates for health interventions for inclusion health populations, including migrants. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Interventions to improve perinatal outcomes among migrant women in high-income countries: a systematic review protocol.BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 17;13(8):e072090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072090. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37591637 Free PMC article.
-
The global burden of perinatal common mental health disorders and substance use among migrant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Public Health. 2023 Mar;8(3):e203-e216. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00342-5. Lancet Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36841561
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Do Antenatal Interventions Improve Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes for Migrant Women Living in High-Income Countries and What Guidelines Exist for Migrant Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Birth. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1111/birt.12903. Online ahead of print. Birth. 2025. PMID: 40028818 Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
References
-
- International Organization for Migration World migration report 2022. https://www.iom.int/wmr/interactive
-
- Batalova J., Batalova J. 2020. Immigrant women and girls in the United States.https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrant-women-and-girls-united... 2020-03-03.
-
- Office for National Statistics Births by parents' country of birth, England and Wales. ONS. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarri...
-
- Haith-Cooper M., Bradshaw G. Meeting the health and social care needs of pregnant asylum seekers; midwifery students' perspectives: Part 3; “The pregnant woman within the global context”; an inclusive model for midwifery education to address the needs of asylum. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(9):1045–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.016. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources