Universal school-based e-health interventions for wellbeing, anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39640963
- PMCID: PMC11618968
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076241302204
Universal school-based e-health interventions for wellbeing, anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Given that 'digitally native' children and young people spend much time at school, universal e-mental health interventions (ueMHIs) may have a role in supporting their wellbeing and reducing common mental health problems like anxiety and depression. However, the efficacy of school-based ueMHIs has never formally been evaluated.
Methods: During this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched online databases MEDLINE, ERIC and ACM and the grey literature for trials of school-based ueMHIs targeted at improving wellbeing or reducing anxiety or depression in students aged 5-18. Primary outcomes were changes in symptoms of wellbeing, anxiety and depression at <3 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in these symptoms at 3-12 months and >12 months. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Quality of included studies was appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023421872.
Findings: From 11,026 screened records, 15 papers were found and included in a systematic review. Of these, 14 papers including 8844 students were analysed in the meta-analysis. School-based ueMHIs did not significantly reduce anxiety (SMD = -0.55, 95% CI -1.68, 0.59) or depression (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.89, 0.32) at <3 months. School-based ueMHIs also did not significantly reduce anxiety (SMD = -1.03, 95% CI -3.20, 1.14) or depression (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI -1.40, 0.46) at 3-12 months. School-based ueMHIs did not significantly improve wellbeing at <3 months (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.12, 0.14) and favoured control condition at 3-12 months (SMD = -0.14, 95% CI -0.23, -0.05). RoB was high across most studies and the overall quality of evidence was very low.
Interpretation: Although existing school-based ueMHIs show promise for addressing pupil mental health concerns, further higher-quality evidence is needed. There is room for the development of new school-based ueMHIs for reducing pupil anxiety and depression and improving wellbeing in a scalable, clinically and cost-effective manner, whilst not causing harm.
Keywords: Universal school-based interventions; anxiety; child and adolescent; depression; digital interventions; e-health; mental health; wellbeing; youth.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Mobile apps to reduce depressive symptoms and alcohol use in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 26;20(2):e1398. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1398. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38680950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Technology-based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 27;18(3):e1271. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1271. eCollection 2022 Sep. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36909881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018. Campbell Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 37131375 Free PMC article.
-
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018. Campbell Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 37131379 Free PMC article.
-
Primary-level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of well-being in low- and middle-income countries.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 24;10(10):CD014722. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014722.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37873968 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the evidence: a systematic review of reviews of the effectiveness and safety of digital interventions for ADHD.BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06825-0. BMC Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40264083 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, et al. Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet 2007; 369: 1302–1313. - PubMed
-
- WHO. Mental Health and COVID-19: Early evidence of the pandemic’s impact. 2022, Geneva, Switzerland.
-
- Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2013; 382: 1575–1586. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources