Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 5:10:20552076241301963.
doi: 10.1177/20552076241301963. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Differences in teletherapy and telecare?-Experiences of health professionals and patients with video communication in nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy

Norbert Lichtenauer  1   2   3 , Felix Schlachetzki  4 , Inge Eberl  5 , Annette Meussling-Sentpali  3
Affiliations

Differences in teletherapy and telecare?-Experiences of health professionals and patients with video communication in nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy

Norbert Lichtenauer et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The spread and implementation of digital synchronous video communication in telecare and teletherapy has recently increased significantly, not just because of COVID-19 but also due to a global trend towards more digital healthcare services in the last two decades. This shift prompts the question of how digital telesetting differs from a face-to-face setting and which aspects are fundamental.

Methods: As the first part of a mixed-method study, qualitative interviews (n = 20) were conducted from July 2021 to January 2022. Health professionals (n = 13) and patients (n = 7) from occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech therapy, and nursing were interviewed. All interviewees came from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The results were categorized using structured content analysis.

Results: Six main categories and 20 sub-categories were summarized, which can act as barriers or resources in a telesetting. Both sides described a high level of acceptance and approval of telesetting. Motivation and digital skills were of great importance. Furthermore, special features in communication and interaction were described, as well as changes in organizational procedures and a specific process flow in telesetting. Including relatives was more feasible, although several environmental factors should be considered.

Discussion: A number of specific changes in a telesetting compared to a face-to-face setting show the need for a structured guide for interested parties. Appropriate basic principles must be taught in training and further education to support the spread of this new form of care. Furthermore, it is crucial to adapt the methodological and content-related aspects of telesetting and develop new approaches that specifically integrate audio-visual possibilities.

Keywords: Teletherapy; guideline; recommendation for action; synchronous video communication; telenursing; video consultations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Illustration of the mixed methods approach; own illustration.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bechtel P. Pflege im Wandel gestalten–eine Führungsaufgabe: Lösungsansätze, Strategien, Chancen. Berlin: Springer, 2017.
    1. Radtke R. Prognostizierter Bedarf an stationären und ambulanten Pflegekräften in Deutschland bis zum Jahr 2035: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2022, https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/172651/umfrage/bedarf-an-... (2022, accessed 9 January 2024).
    1. Klemm M, Preutenborbeck J, et al. Akzeptanz und Gelingensfaktoren: Einführung innovativer technischer und digitaler Produkte. In: Weber K, Haug S, Lauer N. (eds) Digitale Technik für ambulante Pflege und Therapie Impulse für die Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2023, pp.83–98.
    1. Gentili A, Failla G, Melnyk A, et al. The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 1–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hammersley V, Donaghy E, Parker R, et al. Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. The British Journal of General Practice : The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2019; 69: 595–604. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources