Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 21:11:1445853.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1445853. eCollection 2024.

Genetic association of type 2 diabetes and antidiabetic drug target with skin cancer

Affiliations

Genetic association of type 2 diabetes and antidiabetic drug target with skin cancer

Juyan Zhao et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Several observational studies have suggested that type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for skin cancer, and antidiabetic drugs may reduce skin cancer risk. Nevertheless, the findings remain ambiguous. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aimed to investigate the causal association of T2D with skin cancer and evaluate the potential impact of antidiabetic drug targets on skin cancer.

Methods: Genetic variants associated with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), and antidiabetic drug targets (KCNJ11, ABCC8, PPARG, INSR, GLP1R, SLC5A2, and DPP4) were sourced from genome-wide association studies in the UK Biobank and the DIAMANTE consortium. Genetic summary statistics on skin cancer were obtained from the FinnGen consortium. MR analysis was primarily performed leveraging the inverse-variance weighted method, with additional sensitivity analyses conducted. Summary data-based MR (SMR) was utilized to further investigate the association between antidiabetic drug target gene expression and skin cancer. Colocalization analysis was carried out to verify the robustness of the results.

Results: Genetically proxied elevated levels of HbA1c were found to be suggestively associated with a reduced risk of melanoma (OR: 0.886, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.792-0.991, p = 0.0347). Additionally, genetically proxied T2D was notably associated with a lower risk of basal cell carcinoma (OR: 0.960, 95% CI: 0.928-0.992, p = 0.0147). The study also discovered that perturbation of the antidiabetic drug target SLC5A2 was significantly associated with an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma (for SLC5A2 perturbation equivalent to a 6.75 mmol/mol decrement in HbA1c: OR: 2.004, 95% CI: 1.270-3.161, p = 0.0027). However, this finding was not supported by colocalization analysis. Notably, no other drug target perturbations were found to be associated with skin cancer. Furthermore, SMR analysis failed to detect an association between antidiabetic drug target genes and skin cancer.

Conclusion: The study suggests that higher HbA1c levels and T2D may be associated with a reduced risk of skin cancer. However, the results did not provide evidence to support the association between antidiabetic drug targets and skin cancer. Further evaluation of these drug targets is required to confirm the findings in this analysis.

Keywords: Mendelian randomization; antidiabetic drugs; colocalization analysis; skin Cancer; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; T2D, type 2 diabetes; BCC, basal cell carcinoma; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell cancer; DIAGRAM, Diabetes Meta-Analysis of Trans-Ethnic association studies; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphisms; WME, weighted median estimator; MR-RAPS, Mendelian randomization robust adjusted profile score; MR-RESSO, Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier; HEIDI, heterogeneity in dependent instruments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mendelian randomization results of HbA1c with risk of skin cancer. nSNPs, number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; BCC, basal cell carcinoma; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell cancer; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; MR-RAPS, MR-robust adjusted profile score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mendelian randomization results for type 2 diabetes with risk of skin cancer. nSNPs, number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; T2D, type 2 diabetes; BCC, basal cell carcinoma; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell cancer; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; MR-RAPS, MR-robust adjusted profile score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association of genetically proxied perturbation of antidiabetic drug targets with risk of skin cancer. The OR and 95% CI indicate the effect estimates of an increase in skin cancer per SD unit (6.75 mmol/mol) reduction of HbA1c via antidiabetic drugs. nSNPs, number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; BCC, basal cell carcinoma; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell cancer; IVW, inverse-variance weighted.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Long GV, Swetter SM, Menzies AM, Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet. (2023) 402:485–502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00821-8, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal P, Knabel P, Fleischer AB. United States burden of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer from 1990 to 2019. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2021) 85:388–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.109, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. The LO. Climate change and skin cancer: urgent call for action. Lancet Oncol. (2023) 24:823. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00348-0, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmad E, Lim S, Lamptey R, Webb DR, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. (2022) 400:1803–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01655-5, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saarela K, Tuomilehto J, Sund R, Keskimäki I, Hartikainen S, Pukkala E. Cancer incidence among Finnish people with type 2 diabetes during 1989-2014. Eur J Epidemiol. (2019) 34:259–65. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0438-0, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources