Geographical variation in lung function: Results from the multicentric cross-sectional BOLD study
- PMID: 39641354
- PMCID: PMC11627206
- DOI: 10.1080/25310429.2024.2430491
Geographical variation in lung function: Results from the multicentric cross-sectional BOLD study
Abstract
Spirometry is used to determine what is "unusual" lung function compared with what is "usual" for healthy non-smokers. This study aimed to investigate regional variation in the forced vital capacity (FVC) and in the forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC ratio (FEV1/FVC) using cross-sectional data from all 41 sites of the multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Participants (5,368 men; 9,649 women), aged ≥40 years, had performed spirometry, had never smoked and reported no respiratory symptoms or diagnoses. To identify regions with similar FVC, we conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) on FVC with age, age2 and height2, separately for men and women. We regressed FVC against age, age2 and height2, and FEV1/FVC against age and height2, for each sex and site, stratified by region. Mean age was 54 years (both sexes), and mean height was 1.69 m (men) and 1.61 m (women). The PCA suggested four regions: 1) Europe and richer countries; 2) the Near East; 3) Africa; and 4) the Far East. For the FVC, there was little variation in the coefficients for age, or age2, but considerable variation in the constant (men: 2.97 L in the Far East to 4.08 L in Europe; women: 2.44 L in the Far East to 3.24 L in Europe) and the coefficient for height2. Regional differences in the constant and coefficients for FEV1/FVC were minimal (<1%). The relation of FVC with age, sex and height varies across and within regions. The same is not true for the FEV1/FVC ratio.
Keywords: Cross-sectional studies; airflow obstruction; forced expiratory volume; forced vital capacity; global health.
Plain language summary
The relation of FVC to age and height varies geographically, but there is no geographical variation in the FEV1/FVC ratio. These findings may be useful for identifying specific restrictive lung disease, and they do not alter the current advice to use a single global standard when assessing severity of disease.
Conflict of interest statement
DM is a consultant to AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech and Up to Date, and an expert witness on behalf of people suing the Tobacco and Vaping Industries. RN has received funding from AstraZeneca and is the Chair of the Norwegian Respiratory Society. FR reports grants and personal fees from A. Menarini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva Pharma, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, VitalAire and Nippon Gases outside the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report working party standardization of lung function tests, european community for steel and coal. Official statement of the European respiratory society. Eur Respir J. 1993;6(Suppl 16):5–40. doi:10.1183/09041950.005s1693. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources