Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Feb:131:108574.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108574. Epub 2024 Nov 29.

The feasibility of sharing digital audio-recordings of clinic visits online with older adults in primary care settings: A multisite trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The feasibility of sharing digital audio-recordings of clinic visits online with older adults in primary care settings: A multisite trial

Paul J Barr et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this trial was to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of sharing audio recordings of primary care visits with older adults with multimorbidity.

Methods: We used a two-arm, randomized, controlled, feasibility trial with 3-month follow-up. Patients aged ≥ 65 years-with diabetes and hypertension-were recruited from academic primary care settings in New Hampshire, Tennessee, and Texas. Patients were randomized to receive online access to audio recordings of scheduled visits for three-months or care as usual (after visit summaries). Primary outcomes were acceptability and feasibility assessed using several indicators: acceptabilityrecruitment of 90 patients; recording use; and the Appropriateness of Intervention Measure (AIM; >3), feasibility- retention rate; protocol adherence; and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; >3). Interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 14) and patients (n = 19). Exploratory outcomes included patient activation, satisfaction, adherence, and quality of life.

Results: We met recruitment (n = 91) and retention (98 %) targets and exceeded feasibility (Median FIM 4; IQR 3 - 4) and acceptability (Median AIM 4; IQR 3 - 4) metrics. Fidelity to protocol was high (92 %), and 40 of 45 patients (85 %) accessed their recordings. Interviewees noted the benefits of visit recording, including greater recall, understanding, and family engagement. Recording had little perceived impact on the visit interaction, and concerns about visit recording were minimal. Exploratory outcomes revealed better PROMIS Mental Health Scores for patients receiving Audio compared to Usual Care at 3 months: 51.5 (SD 7.7) vs. 47.7 (SD 9.9), P = 0.04.

Conclusions: Sharing visit recordings online with older adults is feasible and acceptable. A larger trial is needed to determine the impact of sharing recordings on patient health outcomes.

Practice implications: Recording is a highly scalable approach to supporting older adults and their care partners in managing care. Advances in natural language processing may unlock further opportunities for this innovative strategy.

Keywords: Older adults; Patient centered communication; Technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. HealthPAL is software developed with NIH funding (R01LM012815) by Dr. Barr and is freely available at GITHUB https://github.com/openrecordings/healthpal; HealthPAL has not been commercialized and Dr. Barr receives no financial incentives or income related to its use.

References

    1. Bayliss EA, Ellis JL, and Steiner JF, “Barriers to self-management and quality-of-life outcomes in seniors with multimorbidities.,” Ann Fam Med, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 395–402, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1370/afm.722. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chin J et al., “Cognition and Health Literacy in Older Adults’ Recall of Self-Care Information,” Gerontologist, vol. 124, no. 2, p. gnv091, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv091. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson PWB and McKinstry B, “A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations.,” J R Soc Med, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 235–43, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kessels RPC, “Patients’ memory for medical information.,” J R Soc Med, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 219–222, May 2003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy DM, Waite KR, Curtis LM, Engel KG, Baker DW, and Wolf MS, “What Did the Doctor Say? Health Literacy and Recall of Medical Instructions,” Med Care, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 277, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1097/MLR.0B013E318241E8E1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources