Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):116-125.
doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000535.

Mitigating and managing infection risk in adults treated with CAR T-cell therapy

Affiliations
Review

Mitigating and managing infection risk in adults treated with CAR T-cell therapy

Nadeem Tabbara et al. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. .

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has transformed the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Yet, this therapy is not without toxicities. While the early inflammation-mediated toxicities are now better understood, delayed hematopoietic recovery and infections result in morbidity and mortality risks that persist for months following CAR-T. The predisposition to infections is a consequence of immunosuppression from the underlying disease, prior therapies, lymphodepletion chemotherapy, delayed hematopoietic recovery, B-cell aplasia, and delayed T-cell immune reconstitution. These risks and epidemiology can vary over a post-CAR-T timeline of early (<30 days), prolonged (30-90 days), or late (>90 days) follow-up. Antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal prophylaxis; growth factors and stem cell boost to expedite count recovery; immunoglobulin replacement therapy; and possibly revaccination programs are important prevention strategies to consider for infection mitigation. Assessment of risk factors, evaluation, and treatment for pathogen(s) prevalent in a particular time frame post-CAR-T are important clinical considerations in patients presenting with clinical features suggestive of infectious pathology. As more data emerge on the topic, personalized risk assessments to inform the type and duration of prophylaxis use and planning interventions will continue to emerge. Herein, we review our current approach toward infection mitigation while recognizing that this continues to evolve and that there are differences among practices stemming from data availability limitations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nadeem Tabbara has no competing financial interests to declare.

M. Veronica Dioverti-Prono reports consultancy fees for Regeneron and research funding from AlloVir and Regeneron.

Tania Jain reports institutional research funding from CTI BioPharma, Kartos Therapeutics, Incyte, and Bristol Myers Squibb and advisory board participation with Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, AbbVie, CTI, Kite, Cogent Biosciences, Blueprint Medicines, Telios Pharma, Protagonist Therapeutics, Galapagos, TScan Therapeutics, Karyopharm, and MorphoSys.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Risk factors for infections in the various time frames following CAR T-cell infusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Estimated range of % of patients who develop infections over time with CD19-directed and BCMA-directed CAR T-cells (recognizing variations in reporting and criteria used) derived from refs. ,,,,, *Data in BCMA-CAR-T recipients are limited.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Dominant pathogen risk over the post-CAR-T timeline. *Fading boxes for the same pathogen over time suggest a lower risk of the pathogen in that time frame. **If a pathogen is not included in a time frame, it suggests that the risk is lower (not absent). Clinical consideration should be made as appropriate. #High-risk factors considered for invasive mold infection include prolonged severe neutropenia, recent BMT, prolonged use of steroids, and use of BTK inhibitors.

References

    1. Kanate AS, Majhail N, DeFilipp Z, et al.. Updated indications for immune effector cell therapy: 2023 Guidelines from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023;29(10):594-597. - PubMed
    1. Jain T, Bar M, Kansagra AJ, et al.. Use of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in clinical practice for relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an expert panel opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(12):2305-2321. - PubMed
    1. Hines MR, Knight TE, McNerney KO, et al.. Immune effector cell associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023;29(7):438.e1-438438.e16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain T, Knezevic A, Pennisi M, et al.. Hematopoietic recovery in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2020;4(15):3776-3787. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neelapu SS, Tummala S, Kebriaei P, et al.. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy - assessment and management of toxicities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(1):47-62. - PMC - PubMed

Substances