Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Dec 6;54(1):1.
doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10117-1.

Orthographic and Meaning Processes in Reading Chinese Compounds: Comparisons Between L1 and L2 Reading

Lin Chen  1   2   3 , Charles Perfetti  4 , Yi Xu  5
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Orthographic and Meaning Processes in Reading Chinese Compounds: Comparisons Between L1 and L2 Reading

Lin Chen et al. J Psycholinguist Res. .

Abstract

Research on alphabetic reading presents conflicting findings concerning the timing of orthographic and meaning processes in reading morphologically complex words. Chinese characters offer distinct visual cues for morphemes, enabling straightforward manipulations to examine orthographic and meaning processes. Guided by the Character-Word Dual Function model, we report four priming experiments that test how a reader's lexical quality impacts the emergence of orthographic and semantic priming effects in reading Chinese compounds. We conducted comparisons between native Chinese speakers and Chinese L2 learners, who vary in their quality of lexical representations. By manipulating the semantic transparency of prime-target pairs, we distinguished meaning from orthographic effects. The emergence of these effects was revealed by varying prime exposure durations. Orthographic effects emerged at shorter exposures for both L1 and L2 readers. However, meaning effects appeared at longer exposure durations only for L1 readers. These results confirm the generality of the orthography-first emergence of morphological effect in reading Chinese and suggest that readers' access to morphological meaning relations increases with experience.

Keywords: L1-L2 comparison; Meaning; Morpheme; Morphology; Orthography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

    1. Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018366 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JML.2012.12.001 - DOI
    1. Andrews, S., Lo, S., & Xia, V. (2017). Individual differences in automatic semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(5), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/XHP0000372 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews, S., Veldre, A., & Clarke, I. E. (2020). Measuring lexical quality: The role of spelling ability. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2257–2282. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-020-01387-3/TABLES/12 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JML.2007.12.005 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources