Survival Impacts of Mitochondrial Status in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients
- PMID: 39645554
- PMCID: PMC11811432
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16533-w
Survival Impacts of Mitochondrial Status in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the survival impacts of mitochondrial status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery.
Methods: In total, 260 pre-NAC samples from ESCC patients were analyzed. Mitochondrial status was estimated employing an objective, immunohistochemistry-based system (Mito-score). Mito-scores were dichotomized according to the median value of our cohort. We also evaluated the immune microenvironment (CD4, CD8, Foxp3, HLA class-1, Ki-67 and programmed death ligand-1) on pre-NAC specimens. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS).
Results: Patients with cT3-4 tumors had higher Mito-scores than those with cT1-2 tumors (p = 0.06), and good responders to NAC had significantly higher Mito-scores than poor responders to NAC (p = 0.04). CD8 cells and Ki-67 expression were significantly higher in Mito-high than Mito-low tumors (p = 0.017 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with low Mito-scores had significantly poorer OS than those with high Mito-scores (3-year OS: 57.6% vs. 68.2%; p = 0.03). A survival difference by Mito-score was evident in cStage III-IV patients (3-year OS: low 50.6% vs. high 66.1%; p = 0.006). Multivariable analysis revealed that a low Mito-score (hazard ratio 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.24; p = 0.009) as well as pT3-4 disease (p < 0.001) and pN2-3 disease (p < 0.001) were independently associated with poor OS outcomes.
Conclusions: A low Mito-score before NAC had a significant survival impact in ESCC patients, especially in those with advanced disease. Mitochondrial status might be associated with tumor aggressiveness and responsiveness to NAC, thereby possibly affecting the survival outcomes of ESCC patients.
Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Mitochondria; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Tumor microenvironment.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: Kotaro Sugawara, Shingo Sakashita, Takashi Fukuda, Chiaki Murakami, Daiji Oka, Gulanbar Amori, Kumiko Ishibashi, Yasuhito Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kanda, and Noriko Motoi have no conflicts of interest to declare that may be relevant to the contents of this study. Human and Animal Rights: All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the form of opt-out on the website. Those who rejected participation, were excluded.
Figures



References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. - PubMed
-
- Eyck BM, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof M, et al. Ten-year outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18):1995–2004. - PubMed
-
- Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74. - PubMed
-
- Kato K, Ito Y, Daiko H, et al. A randomized controlled phase III trial comparing two chemotherapy regimen and chemoradiotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, JCOG1109 NExT study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4 Suppl):238–238.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials