Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;77(6):700-709.
doi: 10.1002/acr.25479. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

Measuring Frailty in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Patricia Katz  1 , Maria Dall'Era  1 , Laura Plantinga  1 , Kamil E Barbour  2 , Kurt J Greenlund  2 , Jinoos Yazdany  1
Affiliations

Measuring Frailty in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Patricia Katz et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Recent research has explored frailty in systemic lupus erythematosus using multiple measures. We examined the agreement among frailty measures and the association of each with cross-sectional and longitudinal health outcomes.

Methods: We used data from the California Lupus Epidemiology Study to examine the following measures of frailty: Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Frailty Index (SLICC-FI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss of Weight (FRAIL) scale questionnaire. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function 10a (PF) was tested as a proxy measure of frailty. Agreement between frailty classifications by each measure was assessed. Cross-sectional associations of frailty classifications with hospitalization, valued life activities disability, cognitive impairment, six-minute walk test distance, self-reported disease damage, fatigue, and depressive symptoms were assessed with logistic and linear regression analyses. Associations with hospitalization, disease damage increase, and disability increase over the subsequent three years were assessed by Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results: Percentages of participants identified as frail varied among the measures, from 10.8% to 45.9%. Agreement among classifications ranged from slight to substantial (k from 0.17 to 0.63). Most of the frailty measures were associated with both cross-sectional and longitudinal health outcomes, with the notable exception of the SPPB. SLICC-FI had the most consistent association with outcomes, followed by FRAIL and PF.

Conclusion: Multiple measures of frailty appear to identify the risk of poor health outcomes. The intended use, as well as the simplicity and practicality of implementing the measure, may be the most important considerations in choosing a frailty measure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M146–M156.
    1. Bandeen‐Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the Women's Health and Aging Studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61:262–266.
    1. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self‐reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49(2):M85–M94.
    1. Rockwood K. Conceptual models of frailty: accumulation of deficits. Can J Cardiol 2016;32:1046–1050.
    1. Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16:601–608.

LinkOut - more resources