Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Dec;96(12):e70070.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.70070.

COVID-19 and Oncofertility: No SARS-CoV-2 in Semen but Inflammation Seems to Affect Sperm Parameters

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

COVID-19 and Oncofertility: No SARS-CoV-2 in Semen but Inflammation Seems to Affect Sperm Parameters

Laure Chaput et al. J Med Virol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, driven by SARS-CoV-2, led authorities to recommend halting assisted reproductive technology programs, focusing instead on fertility preservation, for cancer patients. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen remains controversial. This multicentric prospective cohort study, conducted across 12 university medical centers, aimed to determine if SARS-CoV-2 is present in spermatozoa/seminal plasma in cancer patients by RT-PCR and to assess its impact on standard semen parameters. The levels of cytokines and TNF-α were measured in seminal fluid by ELISA. We enrolled 129 men who underwent sperm cryopreservation between July 7, 2020, and June 30, 2021. The 63 were included and tested for COVID-19 in nasal swab samples by RT-PCR and/or by serology. All patients were asymptomatic on the day of semen collection: 50 were uninfected, 8 had a positive nasal swab (PCR+) and 5 were seropositive. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in the seminal fluid or spermatozoa. Ejaculate volume was significantly lower in the PCR+ group compared to the uninfected group (median [IQR]: 2.6 mL [1.6-3.4] vs. 4.6 mL [2.6-5.2] p < 0.05). Total and progressive motility were lower in the PCR+ group compared to the seropositive group (32.5% [25.0-45.0] vs. 50% [49.0-55.0] p < 0.05, and 22.5% [10.0; 32.5] vs. 44.5% [40-49] p < 0.05). Higher TNF-α level was observed in the PCR+ group (1.9 pg/mL [0-3.9]) compared to the uninfected group (0 pg/mL [0-0.4]) p < 0.05. Although SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sperm samples of cancer patients who were PCR+, the infection appears to impact sperm parameters, likely due to inflammation.

Keywords: SARS‐CoV‐2; cancer; fertility preservation; semen parameters; seminal fluid inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study inclusion for patients with cancer undergoing fertility preservation. PCR+ indicates detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA by RT‐PCR; seropositive is the presence of IgG and IgM anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 in the blood serum.

References

    1. Liu C., Zhao Y., Okwan‐Duodu D., Basho R., and Cui X., “COVID‐19 in Cancer Patients: Risk, Clinical Features, and Management,” Cancer Biology and Medicine 17, no. 3 (2020): 519–527. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creta M., Sagnelli C., Celentano G., et al., “SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection Affects the Lower Urinary Tract and Male Genital System: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Medical Virology 93, no. 5 (2021): 3133–3142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hajizadeh Maleki B. and Tartibian B., “COVID‐19 and Male Reproductive Function: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study,” Reproduction 161, no. 3 (2021): 319–331. - PubMed
    1. Wang S., Zhang A., Pan Y., et al., “Association Between COVID‐19 and Male Fertility: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Observational Studies,” World Journal of Men's Health 41, no. 2 (2023): 311–329. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann M., Kleine‐Weber H., Schroeder S., et al., “SARS‐CoV‐2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor,” Cell 181, no. 2 (2020): 271–280.e8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources