Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 20;60(4):521-528.
doi: 10.32615/ps.2022.045. eCollection 2022.

Evidence of photosynthetic acclimation to self-shading in sugarcane canopies

Affiliations

Evidence of photosynthetic acclimation to self-shading in sugarcane canopies

R L Almeida et al. Photosynthetica. .

Abstract

Increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis in sugarcane canopies is the key for improving crop yield. Herein, we evaluated the photosynthetic performance along the canopy of ten sugarcane cultivars and three Saccharum species. Canopy morphological traits were evaluated, and leaf gas exchange was measured in the first (sun-exposed, +1) and the fourth (shaded, +4) fully expanded leaves and under low- and high-light conditions. Similar photosynthetic capacity was found in leaves +1 and +4 under high light in genotypes with a high leaf area index and a high fraction of the sky blocked by the foliage (> 85%). Interestingly, such canopy characteristics cause low light availability to leaves +4, suggesting the photosynthetic acclimation of these leaves to self-shading in some genotypes. We highlight IACCTC06-8126 and CTC4 as those genotypes with higher canopy photosynthetic capacity, presenting high leaf area, high photosynthetic rates in sun-exposed leaves, and high responsiveness of shaded leaves to increasing light availability.

Keywords: Saccharum spp; light; photosynthesis; plant canopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Leaf area index (LAI) (A), tillering (B), visible sky ratio – fraction of the sky that is not blocked by the foliage (C), and photosynthetic photon flux density on leaf +4 (Q) (D) of thirteen sugarcane genotypes. Different letters indicate statistical differences between genotypes (BF10 > 3, n = 4).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Photosynthetic rate (PN) (A), stomatal conductance (gs) (B), instantaneous CO2 quantum efficiency (ΦCO2) (C), and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (k) (D) in leaves +1 and +4 of thirteen sugarcane genotypes under high light [index ‘H’, Q = 2,000 μmol(photon) m–2 s–1]. * indicates a difference between leaves +1 and +4 (BF10 > 3, n = 4).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Ratio of photosynthesis between leaves +4 and +1 (PN+4H:+1H) of thirteen sugarcane genotypes under high light [index ‘H’, Q = 2,000 μmol(photon) m–2 s–1]. Different letters indicate statistical differences between genotypes (BF10 > 3, n = 4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Ratios of photosynthesis (PN+4L:+4H), stomatal conductance (gs+4L:+4H), instantaneous CO2 quantum efficiency (ΦCO2+4L:+4H), and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (k+4L:+4H) in leaf +4 of thirteen sugarcane genotypes under low [index ‘L’, Q = 200 μmol(photon) m–2 s–1] and high [index ‘H’, Q = 2,000 μmol(photon) m–2 s–1] light. Different letters indicate statistical differences between genotypes (BF10 > 3, n = 4).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Correlation of thirteen sugarcane genotypes, based on Spearman's coefficient (P<0.05). Photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), instantaneous CO2 quantum efficiency (ΦCO2), and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (k) and ratios considering leaves +1 and +4 and light level [low (L) or high (H)]; photosynthetic photon flux density (Q), leaf area index (LAI), the proportion of the sky that is not blocked by the foliage (Sky ratio), mean tilt angle of the foliage (MTA) and tillering.

References

    1. Almeida R.L., Silveira N.M., Pacheco V.S. et al.: Variability and heritability of photosynthetic traits in Saccharum complex. – Theor. Exp. Plant Phys. 33: 343-355, 2021. 10.1007/s40626-021-00217-x - DOI
    1. Bellasio C., Griffiths H.: Acclimation of C4 metabolism to low light in mature maize leaves could limit energetic losses during progressive shading in a crop canopy. – J. Exp. Bot. 65: 3725-3736, 2014. 10.1093/jxb/eru052 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheavegatti-Gianotto A., de Abreu H.M.C., Arruda P. et al.: Sugarcane (Saccharum × officinarum): a reference study for the regulation of genetically modified cultivars in Brazil. – Trop. Plant Biol. 4: 62-89, 2011. 10.1007/s12042-011-9068-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collison R.F., Raven E.C., Pignon C.P., Long S.P.: Light, not age, underlies the maladaptation of maize and Miscanthus photosynthesis to self-shading. – Front. Plant Sci. 11: 783, 2020. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00783 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cruz L.P., Machado E.C., Ribeiro R.V.: Estimating the light conversion efficiency by sugarcane: the segmented approach. – An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 94: e20211317, 2022. 10.1590/0001-3765202220211317 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources