Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct-Dec;17(4):315-319.
doi: 10.25259/jcas_175_23. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

Efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency in acne scars

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency in acne scars

Undavalli Navyadevi et al. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2024 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To study the efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency (MNRF) in the treatment of acne scars.

Material and methods: This is a hospital-based and prospective interventional study. A total of 44 patients (18- 55 years old), skin types III-V, with acne scars, were enrolled. Four sessions of MNRF (Lumenis legend PRO Machine, with non-insulated needle tips GEN6, GEN6L; Israel) were done with an interval of 3 weeks between each session and followed up 1 month after the last session. The outcome was assessed by Goodman and Baron's qualitative and quantitative acne scar grading, physician global assessment (PGA), and patient satisfaction score (PSS).

Results: Out of 44 patients, four patients could not complete the study. Goodman and Baron's qualitative assessment showed patients with Grades 2, 3, and 4 were 6 (15%), 17 (42.5%), and 17 (42.5%), respectively. At the end of follow-up, patients with Grades 1, 2, 4, and 4 acne scars were 5 (12.5%), 24 (60%), 10 (25%), and 1 (2.5%), respectively, which were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Seven patients showed no improvement. Goodman and Baron's quantitative assessment showed an initial mean of 12.65 and an after-follow-up mean of 8.3, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). PGA and PSS scores showed excellent to good responses of 70% and 82.5%, respectively. Adverse effects such as post-treatment erythema were seen in all patients, and edema was observed in 12 patients. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was noted in two patients.

Conclusion: MNRF was found to be effective with a better safety profile for acne scars.

Keywords: Acne scars; Microneedling radiofrequency; Neocollagenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Comparison of Goodman and Baron’s qualitative assessment grades among patients at baseline and at follow-up (1 month after the last session).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Improvement in the acne scars from (a) grade 4 to (b) grade 2 during follow-up (1 month after the last session).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Improvement in the acne scars from (a) grade 4 to (b) grade 3 during follow-up (1 month after the last session).

References

    1. Bulbul Baskan E, Akin Belli A. Evaluation of the efficacy of microneedle fractional radiofrequency in Turkish patients with atrophic facial acne scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18:1317–21. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fabbrocini G, Annunziata MC, D'Arco V, De Vita V, Lodi G, Mauriello MC, et al. Acne scars: Pathogenesis, classification and treatment. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:893080. doi: 10.1155/2010/893080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy LL, Zeichner JA. Management of acne scarring, part II. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2012;13:331–40. doi: 10.2165/11631410-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zaleski-Larsen LA, Fabi SG, McGraw T, Taylor M. Acne scar treatment: A multimodality approach tailored to scar type. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:S139–49. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000746. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kesty K, Goldberg DJ. Radiofrequency microneedling for acne, acne scars, and more. Dermatol Rev. 2020;1:33–7. doi: 10.1002/der2.9. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources