Financial implications of treating nonsevere gram-negative clinical mastitis in 3 California dairies
- PMID: 39650003
- PMCID: PMC11624342
- DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0548
Financial implications of treating nonsevere gram-negative clinical mastitis in 3 California dairies
Abstract
On 3 large California dairies, 415 lactating cows with nonsevere clinical mastitis (CM) and infected with gram-negative (GN) bacteria were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: nontreated control (CON; 135 cases), 2 d of ceftiofur HCl (SP2; 133 cases), or 5 d of ceftiofur HCl (SP5; 147 cases). Bacteriological cure, clinical cure, mastitis recurrence, culling or death, and overall treatment success differed among treatment groups. Although duration of milk withheld due to mastitis therapy was higher for SP5 (9.4 d), there was no difference between CON (6.9 d) and SP2 (7.1 d). Culling and death rates due to GN CM were the main effects that affected partial cost calculations. Of study cows culled across the 3 herds, a higher proportion of CON cows (25%) were culled compared with SP2 (11%) or SP5 (18%). Mastitis-related expenses were higher ($550) for CON than SP2 ($343) or SP5 ($423). Results of this partial budget evaluation for the 3 California dairies indicated economic justification for treating cases of nonsevere GN CM with ceftiofur HCl for 2 d.
© 2024.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Outcomes after treatment of nonsevere gram-negative clinical mastitis with ceftiofur hydrochloride for 2 or 5 days compared with negative control.J Dairy Sci. 2024 Apr;107(4):2390-2405. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23684. Epub 2023 Nov 2. J Dairy Sci. 2024. PMID: 37923203
-
Negatively controlled, randomized clinical trial to evaluate intramammary treatment of nonsevere, gram-negative clinical mastitis.J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jun;102(6):5438-5457. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16156. Epub 2019 Apr 10. J Dairy Sci. 2019. PMID: 30981475
-
Negatively controlled, randomized clinical trial to evaluate use of intramammary ceftiofur for treatment of nonsevere culture-negative clinical mastitis.J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3321-3338. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15497. Epub 2019 Feb 7. J Dairy Sci. 2019. PMID: 30738678
-
Selective treatment of nonsevere clinical mastitis does not adversely affect cure, somatic cell count, milk yield, recurrence, or culling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Dairy Sci. 2023 Feb;106(2):1267-1286. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22271. Epub 2022 Dec 19. J Dairy Sci. 2023. PMID: 36543640
-
Invited review: Selective treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle.J Dairy Sci. 2023 Jun;106(6):3761-3778. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22826. Epub 2023 Apr 18. J Dairy Sci. 2023. PMID: 37080782 Review.
Cited by
-
Annual and Seasonal Trends in Mastitis Pathogens Isolated from Milk Samples from Dairy Cows of California's San Joaquin Valley Dairies Between January 2009 and December 2023.Vet Sci. 2025 Jun 21;12(7):609. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12070609. Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 40711269 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bruno D.R., Cleale R.M., Jardon G., Short T., Mills B., Pedraza J.R. Outcomes after treatment of nonsevere gram-negative clinical mastitis with ceftiofur hydrochloride for 2 or 5 days compared to negative control. J. Dairy Sci. 2024;107:2390–2405. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23684. 37923203. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cha E., Bar D., Hertl J.A., Tauer L.W., Bennett G., González R.N., Schukken Y.H., Welcome F.L., Gröhn Y.T. The cost and management of different types of clinical mastitis in dairy cows estimated by dynamic programming. J. Dairy Sci. 2011;94:4476–4487. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4123. 21854920. - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Jong E., Creytens L., De Vliegher S., McCubbin K.D., Baptiste M., Leung A.A., Speksnijder D., Dufour S., Middleton J.R., Ruegg P.L., Lam T.J.G.M., Kelton D.F., McDougall S., Godden S.M., Lago A., Rajala-Schultz P.J., Orsel K., Krömker V., Kastelic J.P., Barkema H.W. Selective treatment of nonsevere clinical mastitis does not adversely affect cure, somatic cell count, milk yield, recurrence, or culling: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2023;106:1267–1286. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22271. 36543640. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources