Fecal egg counts and individual milk production in temperate pastoral dairy systems of Australia
- PMID: 39650037
- PMCID: PMC11624332
- DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0555
Fecal egg counts and individual milk production in temperate pastoral dairy systems of Australia
Abstract
Anthelmintic use in lactating dairy cattle has been shown to result in a milk production response in some previous studies. If individual animals within a herd could be identified that would most benefit from anthelmintic treatment, this may reduce anthelmintic resistance. Australian dairy systems are predominantly pasture based, allowing sustained exposure and immune stimulation of cattle to gastrointestinal nematodes. We assessed the relationship between milk production and early-lactation fecal egg counts (FEC) to determine whether cows with higher FEC produced less milk. Ten pasture-based dairy farms in south-west Victoria, Australia, entered an observational study. Individual FEC at a minimum detectable count of 2.5 eggs per gram of feces (epg) were recorded for recently calved primiparous and multiparous cohorts on each farm. All animals were calved ≤30 d at sampling. Body condition scores were assessed at sampling and milk production data were collected from daily milk meters and herd tests to give first 100-d milk production. When separated by primiparous or multiparous status, no difference in the milk production between cows with FEC = 0 and FEC ≥2.5 epg was identified. Between-farm variation was large for FEC and milk production. Fecal egg count at a minimum detectable count of 2.5 epg detected parasitism in primiparous cows postcalving, but the presence and magnitude of parasitism measurable by FEC was not related to milk production in pasture-based Australian dairy systems. In multiparous cows, the rate detection of worm eggs at this analytical sensitivity was lower and the significance of a positive FEC at this analytical sensitivity requires further assessment to ascertain the effect on milk production. Based on our study, it seems unlikely that individual FEC results would be useful as a basis to select individual cows in south-west Victorian dairy herds for anthelmintic treatment.
© 2024.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Faecal egg counts in Australian pasture-based dairy herds.Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2024 Jun;51:101028. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2024.101028. Epub 2024 May 3. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2024. PMID: 38772650
-
Change in milk production after treatment against gastrointestinal nematodes according to grazing history, parasitological and production-based indicators in adult dairy cows.Vet Parasitol. 2014 Mar 17;201(1-2):95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.12.031. Epub 2014 Jan 9. Vet Parasitol. 2014. PMID: 24468428
-
Parasites and parasite management practices of organic and conventional dairy herds in Minnesota.J Dairy Sci. 2015 May;98(5):3143-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9031. Epub 2015 Feb 26. J Dairy Sci. 2015. PMID: 25726119
-
Increase in milk yield following eprinomectin treatment at calving in pastured dairy cattle.Vet Parasitol. 2002 May 2;105(3):191-206. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00024-9. Vet Parasitol. 2002. PMID: 11934459 Clinical Trial.
-
Anthelmintic treatment of dairy cows and its effect on milk production.Vet Rec. 1999 May 22;144(21):581-7. doi: 10.1136/vr.144.21.581. Vet Rec. 1999. PMID: 10378289 Review.
References
-
- Cringoli G., Maurelli M.P., Levecke B., Bosco A., Vercruysse J., Utzinger J., Rinaldi L. The Mini-FLOTAC technique for the diagnosis of helminth and protozoan infections in humans and animals. Nat. Protoc. 2017;12:1723–1732. 10.1038/nprot.2017.067 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dairy Australia Cow Body Condition Scoring Handbook. 1:1–35. 2013. https://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/subtropical-dairy/animal-management-an...
-
- Eysker M., Boersema J.H., Kooyman F.N.J., Ploeger H.W. Resilience of second year grazing cattle to parasitic gastroenteritis following negligible to moderate exposure to gastrointestinal nematode infections in their first year. Vet. Parasitol. 2000;89:37–50. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00189-8. 10729644. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources