Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 7;16(11):e73186.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.73186. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis on Discharge Following Major Cancer Surgery in the Abdomen: Improving Compliance With National Guidelines

Affiliations

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis on Discharge Following Major Cancer Surgery in the Abdomen: Improving Compliance With National Guidelines

Hassan Iqbal. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients, particularly those undergoing abdominal surgery for cancer, is critical to reducing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Despite increased awareness, ensuring appropriate VTE prophylaxis post-discharge remains challenging. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend prolonged prophylaxis in specific cases, yet compliance on discharge often falls short. Method A retrospective audit was conducted on 60 patients admitted for elective abdominal cancer surgery in a District General Hospital (DGH) from January to December 2023. This assessed compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines, both during admission and post-discharge. Following the first audit cycle, educational interventions for junior doctors, posters in relevant departments, and reminders in electronic patient records were implemented to enhance compliance. A second audit cycle was conducted over four months with 30 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Results Initial results showed 100% compliance with VTE assessments and inpatient prophylaxis but only 49.1% compliance with full 28-day post-discharge prophylaxis. Around 24.5% of patients received no further prophylaxis after discharge, while 20.8% exceeded the recommended duration. After the intervention, compliance with recommended VTE prophylaxis improved significantly, with 81.25% of patients completing the prescribed course and only 14.8% receiving inpatient-only prophylaxis. The number of patients exceeding 28 days of prophylaxis decreased from 20.8% to 3.7%. Overall, non-compliance fell from 50.9% to 18.5%. Conclusion Simple, targeted interventions, including education and reminders within electronic records, led to significant improvements in VTE prophylaxis compliance post-abdominal cancer surgery. Continued adherence to these strategies, alongside system-embedded reminders, is expected to sustain these improvements and further reduce VTE-related morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: colon resection; colorectal cancer; deep vein thrombosis (dvt); general surgery and colorectal surgery; postop complication; postoperative thromboprophylaxis; surgical practice; venous thromboembolism (vte).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of patient inclusion and exclusion based on study criteria and prophylaxis administration, in the first cycle.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flow chart of patient inclusion and exclusion based on study criteria and prophylaxis administration, in the second cycle.
Figure 3
Figure 3. VTE prophylaxis post-abdominal cancer surgery, comparing cycle 1 and cycle 2.
VTE: venous thromboembolism

Similar articles

References

    1. NHS Digital: Deaths from venous thrombolic events. [ Aug; 2024 ]. 2023. https://digital.nhs.uk/supplementary-information/2023/deaths-from-venous... https://digital.nhs.uk/supplementary-information/2023/deaths-from-venous...
    1. Thrombosis UK: Why VTE matters. 2024. https://thrombosisuk.org/thrombosis-for-health-care-professionals/why-vt... https://thrombosisuk.org/thrombosis-for-health-care-professionals/why-vt...
    1. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust: Use of Low Molecular Weight Heparins. [ Mar; 2024 ]. 2022. https://elht.nhs.uk/application/files/7815/8935/6968/LMWH_Best_Practice_... https://elht.nhs.uk/application/files/7815/8935/6968/LMWH_Best_Practice_...
    1. NICE NICE. Vol. 1. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng89; 2018. NICE: Venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; p. 14. - PubMed
    1. Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery. Mismetti P, Laporte S, Darmon JY, Buchmüller A, Decousus H. Br J Surg. 2001;88:913–930. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources