Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73167.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.73167. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Intraperitoneal Instillation for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Intraperitoneal Instillation for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Shahbaz Hasnain et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, despite its several advantages, is sometimes associated with discomfort due to pain in the immediate postoperative period. Effective management of this pain is critical for enhancing recovery, minimizing complications, and facilitating early discharge. The use of local anesthetics for intra-abdominal analgesia, specifically bupivacaine and ropivacaine, has been investigated as a means to improve postoperative pain control. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of intra-peritoneal ropivacaine versus bupivacaine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods This prospective, randomized, comparative study was conducted after obtaining institutional ethics committee clearance. Sixty ASA grade I/II patients, aged 18 to 65 years, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 35 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine (Group R) or 35 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) administered intra-peritoneally. Analgesic efficacy was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, heart rate monitoring, and the requirement for rescue analgesia. Data were collected at various time intervals and analyzed using statistical methods. Results Mean heart rate values were significantly lower in Group R compared to Group B from the 2nd to 8th hour and at the 18th hour postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean VAS scores for pain at rest were significantly lower in Group R compared to Group B from the 8th to 24th hour (p < 0.001). A substantially higher proportion of patients in Group B required rescue analgesia compared to Group R (p < 0.05). Specifically, 16.7% of patients in Group R required rescue analgesia versus 43.3% in Group B. The time to the first dose of rescue analgesia was longer in Group R (8.4±3.6 hours) compared to Group B (6.8±11.3 hours), though this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Total analgesic consumption was significantly higher in Group B (20.5±3.2 mg) compared to Group R (14.6±2.8 mg) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Ropivacaine provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to bupivacaine when used for intra-peritoneal instillation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The findings support the use of ropivacaine for effective pain management in this surgical context, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced opioid consumption.

Keywords: bupivacaine; intra-peritoneal analgesia; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; postoperative pain; rescue analgesia; ropivacaine; visual analogue scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS SUB-COMMITTEE issued approval IESC/PGS/2022/153. Research and recognition committee approved (IESC/PGS/2022/153) titled Comparison of Ropivacaine versus Bupivacaine in intraperitoneal instillation for post operative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

References

    1. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Dig Surg. 2002;19:518–522. - PubMed
    1. Laparoscopic surgery may be associated with severe pain and high analgesia requirements in the immediate postoperative period. Ekstein P, Szold A, Sagie B, Werbin N, Klausner JM, Weinbroum AA. Ann Surg. 2006;243:41–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Slim K. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1249. - PubMed
    1. Pain after laparoscopy. Alexander JI. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79:369–378. - PubMed
    1. A prospective randomized trial of intra operative Bupivacaine irrigation for management of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Cunniffe MG, McAnena OJ, Dar MA, et al. Am J Surg. 1998;176:258–261. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources