Standard technique in Japan for measuring hepatic venous pressure gradient
- PMID: 39652102
- PMCID: PMC11717883
- DOI: 10.1007/s00535-024-02182-z
Standard technique in Japan for measuring hepatic venous pressure gradient
Abstract
Background: Direct measurement of portal venous pressure (PVP) is invasive, so the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is commonly measured to evaluate portal hypertension (PH). HVPG is the gold standard for estimating PVP but few reports have covered standardized measurement techniques.
Methods: This study validated standardized techniques for PVP measurement.
Results: In Western countries, electronic transducers are commonly used to measure PVP, whereas the water column method is still frequently applied in Japan. Setting a reference point for accurate PVP measurement is important but complicated. According to Japanese guidelines, the reference point for PVP measurement is 10 cm above the dorsal surface or in the midaxillary line. For simpler determination, the anterior axillary point, defined as the point of convergence between the proximal pectoralis major muscle and arm when both arms are positioned against the trunk in a supine position, can be used as the reference point. New methods, such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient, offer less invasive alternatives. Non-invasive methods like elastography measure liver and spleen stiffness, which correlate with HVPG. The Baveno VII criteria incorporate measurements of liver and splenic stiffness for risk stratification. Biomarkers such as type IV collagen, M2BPGi, and FIB-4 score also predict HVPG. The Baveno VII consensus emphasizes the status of HVPG as the gold standard while advocating for non-invasive alternative methods to improve patient care and monitor treatment efficacy.
Conclusions: Continued development of non-invasive tests is crucial for safer, more convenient PH management.
Keywords: Baveno VII; Elastography; HVPG; PVP; WHVP.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Are there any alternative methods to hepatic venous pressure gradient in portal hypertension assessment?J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Mar;22(1):73-8. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013. PMID: 23539394 Review.
-
Stratified analysis of the correlation between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure in patients with portal hypertension.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 25;14(1):29210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80870-9. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39587242 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of Baveno VII criteria for clinically significant portal hypertension by two-dimensional shear wave elastography.Hepatol Int. 2024 Jun;18(3):1020-1028. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10657-7. Epub 2024 May 13. Hepatol Int. 2024. PMID: 38740698
-
Measurement of portal pressure: when, how, and why to do it.Clin Liver Dis. 2006 Aug;10(3):499-512, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2006.08.005. Clin Liver Dis. 2006. PMID: 17162225 Review.
-
Shear-wave elastography: a noninvasive tool for monitoring changing hepatic venous pressure gradients in patients with cirrhosis.Radiology. 2014 Dec;273(3):917-26. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140008. Epub 2014 Jul 14. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 25025464
References
-
- Myers JD, Taylor WJ. An estimation of portal venous pressure by occlusive catheterization of a hepatic venule. J Clin Invest. 1951;30:662–3.
-
- Tetangco EP, Silva RG, Lerma EV. Portal hypertension: etiology, evaluation, and management. Review Dis Mon. 2016;62:411–26. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources