Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2450272.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.50272.

Weekly Cisplatin Cycles and Outcomes for Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer

Affiliations
Observational Study

Weekly Cisplatin Cycles and Outcomes for Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer

Sung Jun Ma et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend weekly cisplatin as an alternative concurrent systemic therapy for definitive chemoradiation in patients with head and neck cancer. However, the impact of different levels of adherence to weekly cisplatin on outcomes stratified by human papillomavirus p16 status remains unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the association between the number of weekly cisplatin cycles and outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, observational, single-institution cohort study at The Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center included patients with a diagnosis of nonmetastatic head and neck cancer between December 1, 2011, and March 30, 2020, who received chemoradiation. Data analysis was performed between March and May 2024.

Exposure: A total of 5, 6, or 7 to 8 weekly cisplatin cycles.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure (LRF), and distant failure (DF). Cox multivariable analysis was performed for variables associated with OS and PFS, and Fine-Gray multivariable analysis was performed for variables associated with LRF and DF.

Results: A total of 142 patients met the criteria (119 men [83.8%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [54-63] years). Median (IQR) follow-up was 46.8 (40.8-55.6) months. Among 92 patients with reasons for cisplatin interruption reported, the most common reason was low blood counts (42 patients [45.7%]). Those who missed weekly cisplatin cycles had worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.19-4.17; P = .01) and PFS (aHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06-3.15; P = .03) than those who received 7 to 8 cycles. Cancer control outcomes were comparable between these groups (LRF aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.15-1.93; P = .34; DF aHR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.60-3.82; P = .38). Patients with p16-negative tumors who missed weekly cisplatin cycles had worse OS (for every missing cisplatin cycle, aHR, 11.34, 1.51-84.94; P = .02) than those treated with 7 to 8 cycles. However, for those with p16-positive tumors, there were no statistically significant differences in OS between those who missed weekly cisplatin cycles vs others who received 7 to 8 cycles (aHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.47-3.14; P = .69).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer who received definitive chemoradiation, those with p16-negative tumors who missed weekly cisplatin cycles had lower OS than those who received 7 to 8 cycles, although OS was comparable between these groups for p16-positive tumors. Cytopenia represented the most common reason for cisplatin interruption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Zhu reported receiving consulting fees from Radformation, receiving grants from Varian Medical Systems and Google, and being the founder and chief executive officer of IntelliOnc outside the submitted work. Dr Mitchell reported receiving grants from National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (3R01CA262388-02S1) during the conduct of the study. Dr Jhawar reported receiving grants from Varian Medical Systems and consulting fees from Enlace Health outside the submitted work. Dr Bonomi reported receiving grants from Regeneron and personal fees from Merck outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Kaplan-Meier Plots for Survival Outcomes Comparing Patients Who Received 5, 6, and 7 to 8 Weekly Cisplatin Cycles
OS indicates overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cumulative Incidence Plots for Cancer Control Outcomes Comparing Patients Who Received 5, 6, and 7 to 8 Weekly Cisplatin Cycles
DF indicates distant failure; LRF, locoregional failure.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . Head and neck cancers, version 3. 2024. Accessed March 16, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdf
    1. De Felice F, Belgioia L, Alterio D, et al. Survival and toxicity of weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy versus three-weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis endorsed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;162:103345. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103345 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nguyen-Tan PF, Zhang Q, Ang KK, et al. Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0129 trial: long-term report of efficacy and toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(34):3858-3866. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.3925 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noronha V, Joshi A, Patil VM, et al. Once-a-week versus once-every-3-weeks cisplatin chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase III randomized noninferiority trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(11):1064-1072. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9457 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma A, Kumar M, Bhasker S, et al. An open-label, noninferiority phase III RCT of weekly versus three weekly cisplatin and radical radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ConCERT trial). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16)(suppl):6004. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.6004 - DOI

Publication types