Parental attitudes and experiences in pursuing genetic testing for their child's motor speech disorder
- PMID: 39653744
- PMCID: PMC12229557
- DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01755-z
Parental attitudes and experiences in pursuing genetic testing for their child's motor speech disorder
Abstract
Rare and typically severe motor speech disorders such as childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and dysarthria affect about 1 in 1000 children. The genetic basis of these speech disorders is well-documented, with approximately 30% of children who undergo genomic testing receiving an explanatory genetic diagnosis. As more children with speech disorders are offered genetic testing, understanding parental views and experiences around genetic testing for their child is critical in providing effective pre- and post-test genetic counselling. This research explored parental attitudes, experiences, and perceived implications of pursuing genetic testing for their child with motor speech disorder. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 parents of children with CAS or dysarthria who had undergone exome sequencing. Eight parents had received a genetic diagnosis for their child and 12 received uninformative genetic test results. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, co-coded, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Parents were highly motivated to pursue genetic testing for their child's speech disorder due to the perceived personal, clinical, social, and financial utility in obtaining a genetic diagnosis. Regardless of testing outcome, parents experienced complex emotional responses in receiving their child's genetic test results. Parents whose child received a genetic diagnosis reported improved access to funding and clinical care; however, they also hoped for ongoing informational, clinical, and peer support in navigating the uncertainty surrounding their child's rare diagnosis. Conversely, parents who received uninformative genetic test results reported finding meaning in this test outcome, and used emotional-focused and problem-focused strategies to cope with their child's continued diagnostic odyssey.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Human Genetics.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (reference number: 37353).
References
-
- Reilly S, McKean C, Morgan A, Wake M. Identifying and managing common childhood language and speech impairments. BMJ. 2015;350:h2318. 10.1136/bmj.h2318. - PubMed
-
- Morgan A, Ttofari EecanK, Pezic A, Brommeyer K, Mei C, Eadie P, et al. Who to refer for speech therapy at 4 years of age versus who to “watch and wait”? J Pediatr. 2017;185:200–4.e1. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.059. - PubMed
-
- Cassar C, McCabe P, Cumming S. I still have issues with pronunciation of words”: a mixed methods investigation of the psychosocial and speech effects of childhood apraxia of speech in adults. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2023;25:193–205. 10.1080/17549507.2021.2018496. - PubMed
-
- Liégeois FJ, Mei C, Pigdon L, Lee KJ, Stojanowski B, Mackay M, et al. Speech and language impairments after childhood ischemic stroke: Does hemisphere matter? Pediatr Neurol. 2019;92:55–9. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.11.006. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
