Machine Learning Reveals Demographic Disparities in Palliative Care Timing Among Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Receiving Neurosurgical Consultation
- PMID: 39653977
- DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-02172-2
Machine Learning Reveals Demographic Disparities in Palliative Care Timing Among Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Receiving Neurosurgical Consultation
Abstract
Background: Timely palliative care (PC) consultations offer demonstrable benefits for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet their implementation remains inconsistent. This study employs machine learning methods to identify distinct patient phenotypes and elucidate the primary drivers of PC consultation timing variability in TBI management, aiming to uncover disparities and inform more equitable care strategies.
Methods: Data on admission, hospital course, and outcomes were collected for a cohort of 232 patients with TBI who received both PC consultations and neurosurgical consultations during the same hospitalization. Patient phenotypes were uncovered using principal component analysis and K-means clustering; time-to-PC consultation for each phenotype was subsequently compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. An extreme gradient boosting model with Shapley Additive Explanations identified key factors influencing PC consultation timing.
Results: Three distinct patient clusters emerged: cluster A (n = 86), comprising older adult White women (median 87 years) with mild TBI, received the earliest PC consultations (median 2.5 days); cluster B (n = 108), older adult White men (median 81 years) with mild TBI, experienced delayed PC consultations (median 5.0 days); and cluster C (n = 38), middle-aged (median: 46.5 years), severely injured, non-White patients, had the latest PC consultations (median 9.0 days). The clusters did not differ by discharge disposition (p = 0.4) or inpatient mortality (p > 0.9); however, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in time-to-PC consultation (p < 0.001), despite no differences in time-to-mortality (p = 0.18). Shapley Additive Explanations analysis of the extreme gradient boosting model identified age, sex, and race as the most influential drivers of PC consultation timing.
Conclusions: This study unveils crucial disparities in PC consultation timing for patients with TBI, primarily driven by demographic factors rather than clinical presentation or injury characteristics. The identification of distinct patient phenotypes and quantification of factors influencing PC consultation timing provide a foundation for developing for standardized protocols and decision support tools to ensure timely and equitable palliative care access for patients with TBI.
Keywords: Age factors; Cluster analysis; Critical care; Decision support techniques; Health care disparities; Machine learning; Neurosurgery; Palliative care; Prognosis; Quality of health care; Race factors; Sex factors; Traumatic brain injury.
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: Financial Disclosures: Personal Financial Interests: SM has received speaking honoraria from the American Academy of Neurology and serves as a paid member of the Endpoint adjudication committee for Acasti Pharma Inc. Prior Research Funding: SM has received grant funding from R21NR020231 and U01NS119647. The authors have no other competing interest to disclose. Ethical Approval: The Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board approved this study (IRB00309385). Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board for this study as it only involved a retrospective review of medical records.
Update of
-
Machine Learning Identifies Variation in Timing of Palliative Care Consultations Among Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 2:rs.3.rs-4290808. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4290808/v1. Res Sq. 2024. Update in: Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jun;42(3):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02172-2. PMID: 38746163 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
Similar articles
-
Machine Learning Identifies Variation in Timing of Palliative Care Consultations Among Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 2:rs.3.rs-4290808. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4290808/v1. Res Sq. 2024. Update in: Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jun;42(3):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02172-2. PMID: 38746163 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Early palliative care consultation offsets hospitalization duration and costs for elderly patients with traumatic brain injuries: Insights from a Level 1 trauma center.J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Feb;108:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 19. J Clin Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 36542995
-
Older Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: National Variability in Palliative Care.J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Oct 10. J Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 31606512
-
Epidemiology and delays in neurosurgical care among patients with traumatic brain injury in a regional referral hospital in Sri Lanka: a retrospective cohort study.Neurosurg Focus. 2025 Mar 1;58(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2024.12.FOCUS24785. Neurosurg Focus. 2025. PMID: 40022752
-
Factors associated with palliative care referral among patients with advanced cancers: a retrospective analysis of a large Brazilian cohort.Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jun;26(6):1933-1941. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-4031-y. Epub 2018 Jan 5. Support Care Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29305719
Cited by
-
Latent Variable Analysis of Demographic and Clinical Drivers of Care Intensity Before Palliative Care Consultation Among Older Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug;43(1):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02203-y. Epub 2025 Jan 16. Neurocrit Care. 2025. PMID: 39821567
References
-
- TBI Data | Concussion | Traumatic Brain Injury | CDC Injury Center [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 22];Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/data/index.html
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical