Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Mar;27(3):1198-1207.
doi: 10.1111/dom.16111. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

Identifying subgroups benefiting from intensive glycaemic treatment to improve renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Insights from the ACCORD trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Identifying subgroups benefiting from intensive glycaemic treatment to improve renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Insights from the ACCORD trial

Yiqin Wang et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: The ACCORD trial showed that intensive glucose-lowering therapy has a limited impact on renal function decline. We aimed to identify subgroups in the ACCORD population that might derive renal benefits from intensive glucose-lowering therapy.

Materials and methods: The primary renal outcome included a ≥50% decline in baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Using the causal tree model, we employed internal cross-validation to identify five pivotal variables influencing the renal efficacy of intensive glycaemic control. These variables were integrated into the model-based recursive partitioning approach, yielding a visualizable tree model that depicted benefitting subgroups.

Results: Node 4, characterized by no cardiovascular history, systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤142.67 mm Hg, and triglycerides ≤172 mg/dL, showed significantly reduced hazards of the composite renal outcome (fully adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.89; p = 0.006) and doubling of serum creatinine (fully adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.98; p = 0.041). Node 7 (no cardiovascular history and SBP 142.67-154 mm Hg) showed reduced hazards of the primary renal outcome (fully adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.93; p = 0.016) and ESRD (fully adjusted HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.74; p = 0.0057). Encouragingly, neither node 4 nor node 7 displayed elevated cardiovascular risk or hypoglycaemic events.

Conclusions: Through innovative machine learning, we identified ACCORD subgroups benefitting significantly from intensive glycaemic therapy for renal outcomes, without increased cardiovascular or hypoglycaemic risks.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; database research; diabetes complications; diabetic nephropathy; glycaemic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88‐98. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.151
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):405‐412.
    1. Alicic RZ, Rooney MT, Tuttle KR. Diabetic kidney disease: challenges, Progress, and possibilities. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(12):2032‐2045. doi:10.2215/CJN.11491116
    1. ACCORD Study Group, Buse JB, Bigger JT, et al. Action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (ACCORD) trial: design and methods. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(12A):21i‐33i. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.003
    1. Ismail‐Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA, et al. Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9739):419‐430. doi:10.1016/S0140‐6736(10)60576‐4

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources