Clinical Use of Home OCT Data to Manage Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- PMID: 39654701
- PMCID: PMC11625398
- DOI: 10.1177/24741264241302858
Clinical Use of Home OCT Data to Manage Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate how home optical coherence tomography (OCT) influences the clinical decision-making of retina specialists for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: In this retrospective imaging review, 15 retina specialists each evaluated 10 home OCT data segments from 29 eyes being treated for nAMD. Based on OCT data, indications were identified for when eyes should be treated, which antivascular endothelial growth factor should be used, and the specific retinal fluid and time thresholds for notification. Results: Withholding treatment was recommended in 64 (42.7%) of 150 data segments (95% CI, 34.7-50.6), whereas 100% of eyes received treatment on the last day of each data segment. Treatment was recommended in 86 cases (57.3%), with treatment occurring 7 or more days before the actual treatment was advised in 52 (60.5%) of 86 data segments. This earlier treatment would have prevented the accumulation of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and total retinal fluid for 69.1 nL, 162.2 nL, and 231.2 nL days. Retina specialists chose a different type of treatment agent in 35 (40%) of 86 cases. The following notification values were set: IRF, mean 9.8 ± 14.9 nL (median, 5; IQR, 5); SRF, mean 10.2 ± 16.1 nL (median, 5.5; IQR, 5); total retinal fluid, mean 15.2 ± 24.0 nL (median, 10; IQR, 5). The time-based notification interval was set at a mean of 34.7 ± 21.9 days (median, 30; IQR, 2). Conclusions: Home OCT-based decision-making by retina specialists differed substantially from actual clinical care. Home OCT has the potential to facilitate personalized care in nAMD.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; home OCT; imaging review; neovascular age-related macular degeneration; optical coherence tomography; overtreatment; remote monitoring; retina specialists; telemedicine; undertreatment.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: G: Grant, C: Consultant, H: Honorarium, T: Travel Support, S: Shareholder: A: Advisory or Safety Board Member, L: Leadership. JSH: 4D Molecular Therapuetics (G,C,S), Annexon (G,C), Apellis (G,C), AsclepiX Therapeutics (G,C), Ashvattha (G), Bayer (G), Cognition Therapeutics (G), Curacle (G,C), Genentech/Roche (G,C), Gyroscope Therapeutics (G,C), Iveric Bio (G,C), Janssen R&D (G,C), Kodiak (G), NGM (G,C), Novartis (G,C), OcuTerra (G,C), Perceive Bio (G), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (G,C), RegenexBio (G,C), Abpro (C), Adverum (C,S), AffaMed Therapeutics (C), Applied Genetics Technologies Corporation (C), Akouos (C), Aviceda (C,S), Bausch + Lomb (C), Biovisics (C), Clearside (C), DTx Pharma (C,S), Exegenesis (C), Glaukos (C), Gyroscope Therapeutics (C), Immunogen (C), jCyte (C,S), Kriya (C), Nanoscope (C), Notal Vision (C), Ocular Therapeutix (C,L), Ocuphire (C,S), OliX (C), ONL Therapeutics (C), Outlook Therapeutics (C), Palatin Technologies (C), Perceive Biotherapeutics (C), Ray Therapeutics (C), RetinAI (C), RevOpsis Therapeutics (C,S), Stealth BioTherapeutics (C), Théa Pharmaceuticals (C), Vanotech (C), Aldeyra Therapeutics (S), Allegro (S), Vinci Pharmaceuticals (S), Vitranu (S); YL: Genentech (H), Horizon Therapeutics (H), Apellis Pharmaceuticals (H), Regeneron Healthcare Solutions (H), Notal Vision (T), Center for Eye Research and Education (T); NMH: Notal Vision (G,A,S);MHA: Notal (M), Alimera Science (C), Abbvie (C); KJB: Notal Vision (M), Regeneron (C,H), Genentech (C,H), Bausch & Lomb (C,H), Biogen (C); MAB: Notal Vision (M,C,H,T); MAC: Notal Vision (M,C); MJE: Notal Vision (G, T); JGF: Notal Vision (M), Roche (C, A, H), Regeneron (C, A, H); PH: Notal Vision (M), Adverum (G,C), Apellis (G,C,A), Eyepoint (G,C,H,A), Genentech (G,C,H,A), Regeneron (G), RegenxBio (G), Samsara (G), Alcon (C,A), DORC (C,A), ASRS (L); NL: Notal Vision (M), Roche (C), Regeneron (C,A), RegenxBio, (C), Ionis (C), Apellis (C,H), Annexon (C), Genentech (H,A), Iveric Bio (H), EyePoint Pharmaceuticals (A), Opthea (A); TM: Notal Vision (M); YSM: Notal Vision (C), Alimera (C), Allergan (C), Genentech (C), DORC (C), Thea (C), Zeiss (C), Iveric Bio (C), Apellis, Regeneron (C); AR: AGTC (G), Apellis Pharmaceuticals (G,C,), DRCR Retina Network (G), Roche/Genentech (G,C), Abbvie/Allergan (C), Alcon (C), Regeneron (C), Iveric Bio (C), Ocular Therapeutix (C); EWS: Notal Vision (M,C), Carl Zeiss (C); JCW: Genetech (C,A), Carl Zeiss (C); ARS: Notal Vision (M,C), RegenxBio (C), Regeneron (C), Apellis (S). The sponsor of the study is a provider of home OCT monitoring services.
Figures
References
-
- Fleckenstein M, Keenan TDL, Guymer RH, et al.. Age-related macular degeneration. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):31. - PubMed
-
- Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al.. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419-1431. - PubMed
-
- Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, et al.. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2537-2548. - PubMed
-
- Busbee BG, Ho C, Brown DM, et al.. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):1046-1056. - PubMed
-
- Heier JS, Khanani AM, Quezada Ruiz C, et al.. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (TENAYA and LUCERNE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet. 2022;399(10326):729-740. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
