Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 7:24741264241302858.
doi: 10.1177/24741264241302858. Online ahead of print.

Clinical Use of Home OCT Data to Manage Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Affiliations

Clinical Use of Home OCT Data to Manage Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Jeffrey S Heier et al. J Vitreoretin Dis. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate how home optical coherence tomography (OCT) influences the clinical decision-making of retina specialists for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: In this retrospective imaging review, 15 retina specialists each evaluated 10 home OCT data segments from 29 eyes being treated for nAMD. Based on OCT data, indications were identified for when eyes should be treated, which antivascular endothelial growth factor should be used, and the specific retinal fluid and time thresholds for notification. Results: Withholding treatment was recommended in 64 (42.7%) of 150 data segments (95% CI, 34.7-50.6), whereas 100% of eyes received treatment on the last day of each data segment. Treatment was recommended in 86 cases (57.3%), with treatment occurring 7 or more days before the actual treatment was advised in 52 (60.5%) of 86 data segments. This earlier treatment would have prevented the accumulation of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and total retinal fluid for 69.1 nL, 162.2 nL, and 231.2 nL days. Retina specialists chose a different type of treatment agent in 35 (40%) of 86 cases. The following notification values were set: IRF, mean 9.8 ± 14.9 nL (median, 5; IQR, 5); SRF, mean 10.2 ± 16.1 nL (median, 5.5; IQR, 5); total retinal fluid, mean 15.2 ± 24.0 nL (median, 10; IQR, 5). The time-based notification interval was set at a mean of 34.7 ± 21.9 days (median, 30; IQR, 2). Conclusions: Home OCT-based decision-making by retina specialists differed substantially from actual clinical care. Home OCT has the potential to facilitate personalized care in nAMD.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; home OCT; imaging review; neovascular age-related macular degeneration; optical coherence tomography; overtreatment; remote monitoring; retina specialists; telemedicine; undertreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: G: Grant, C: Consultant, H: Honorarium, T: Travel Support, S: Shareholder: A: Advisory or Safety Board Member, L: Leadership. JSH: 4D Molecular Therapuetics (G,C,S), Annexon (G,C), Apellis (G,C), AsclepiX Therapeutics (G,C), Ashvattha (G), Bayer (G), Cognition Therapeutics (G), Curacle (G,C), Genentech/Roche (G,C), Gyroscope Therapeutics (G,C), Iveric Bio (G,C), Janssen R&D (G,C), Kodiak (G), NGM (G,C), Novartis (G,C), OcuTerra (G,C), Perceive Bio (G), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (G,C), RegenexBio (G,C), Abpro (C), Adverum (C,S), AffaMed Therapeutics (C), Applied Genetics Technologies Corporation (C), Akouos (C), Aviceda (C,S), Bausch + Lomb (C), Biovisics (C), Clearside (C), DTx Pharma (C,S), Exegenesis (C), Glaukos (C), Gyroscope Therapeutics (C), Immunogen (C), jCyte (C,S), Kriya (C), Nanoscope (C), Notal Vision (C), Ocular Therapeutix (C,L), Ocuphire (C,S), OliX (C), ONL Therapeutics (C), Outlook Therapeutics (C), Palatin Technologies (C), Perceive Biotherapeutics (C), Ray Therapeutics (C), RetinAI (C), RevOpsis Therapeutics (C,S), Stealth BioTherapeutics (C), Théa Pharmaceuticals (C), Vanotech (C), Aldeyra Therapeutics (S), Allegro (S), Vinci Pharmaceuticals (S), Vitranu (S); YL: Genentech (H), Horizon Therapeutics (H), Apellis Pharmaceuticals (H), Regeneron Healthcare Solutions (H), Notal Vision (T), Center for Eye Research and Education (T); NMH: Notal Vision (G,A,S);MHA: Notal (M), Alimera Science (C), Abbvie (C); KJB: Notal Vision (M), Regeneron (C,H), Genentech (C,H), Bausch & Lomb (C,H), Biogen (C); MAB: Notal Vision (M,C,H,T); MAC: Notal Vision (M,C); MJE: Notal Vision (G, T); JGF: Notal Vision (M), Roche (C, A, H), Regeneron (C, A, H); PH: Notal Vision (M), Adverum (G,C), Apellis (G,C,A), Eyepoint (G,C,H,A), Genentech (G,C,H,A), Regeneron (G), RegenxBio (G), Samsara (G), Alcon (C,A), DORC (C,A), ASRS (L); NL: Notal Vision (M), Roche (C), Regeneron (C,A), RegenxBio, (C), Ionis (C), Apellis (C,H), Annexon (C), Genentech (H,A), Iveric Bio (H), EyePoint Pharmaceuticals (A), Opthea (A); TM: Notal Vision (M); YSM: Notal Vision (C), Alimera (C), Allergan (C), Genentech (C), DORC (C), Thea (C), Zeiss (C), Iveric Bio (C), Apellis, Regeneron (C); AR: AGTC (G), Apellis Pharmaceuticals (G,C,), DRCR Retina Network (G), Roche/Genentech (G,C), Abbvie/Allergan (C), Alcon (C), Regeneron (C), Iveric Bio (C), Ocular Therapeutix (C); EWS: Notal Vision (M,C), Carl Zeiss (C); JCW: Genetech (C,A), Carl Zeiss (C); ARS: Notal Vision (M,C), RegenxBio (C), Regeneron (C), Apellis (S). The sponsor of the study is a provider of home OCT monitoring services.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Home optical coherence tomography (OCT) web viewer interface for data review. An example of a home OCT data segment is shown. Day 0 is the day the patient received the last treatment. Day 43 is the day the patient received the next treatment. The retina specialists were asked to determine whether they would offer a treatment during this time period and if so, which day and what treatment. They were only allowed to offer a treatment at least 28 days from the previous one.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The number and percentage of times when a retina specialist decided not to treat the patient based on the home optical coherence tomography (OCT) data but the patient did receive treatment in actual care based on in-clinic OCT data alone.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The time difference between home OCT–guided treatment and the actual treatment in cases in which retina specialists decided to treat the patient earlier, as shown by each individual retina specialist. Abbreviations: LQ, lower quartile; OCT, optical coherence tomography; UQ, upper quartile.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The distribution of retinal fluid notification thresholds for volume of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and total retinal fluid (TRF) as determined by 15 retina specialists across 6 different eyes.

References

    1. Fleckenstein M, Keenan TDL, Guymer RH, et al.. Age-related macular degeneration. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):31. - PubMed
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al.. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419-1431. - PubMed
    1. Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, et al.. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2537-2548. - PubMed
    1. Busbee BG, Ho C, Brown DM, et al.. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):1046-1056. - PubMed
    1. Heier JS, Khanani AM, Quezada Ruiz C, et al.. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (TENAYA and LUCERNE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet. 2022;399(10326):729-740. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources