Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 8:18:26323524241302097.
doi: 10.1177/26323524241302097. eCollection 2024.

Contextualizing attitudes toward medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: hospice philosophy of care, patient-centered care, and professional exposure

Affiliations

Contextualizing attitudes toward medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: hospice philosophy of care, patient-centered care, and professional exposure

Todd D Becker et al. Palliat Care Soc Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Despite extensive theoretical debate, empirical research on medical aid in dying (MAID) largely has disregarded broader, contextual factors as potential correlates of attitudes in hospice clinicians.

Objective: Informed by institutional theory and neofunctional attitude theory, the objective of the current study was to quantitatively examine hospice clinicians' attitudes toward MAID as functions of institutional characteristics relating to (Aim 1) individual adherence to hospice values and (Aim 2) state law.

Design: We used a cross-sectional design.

Methods: A national convenience sample of interdisciplinary hospice clinicians recruited through US professional membership associations self-administered an online survey. Measures included attitudes toward MAID, attitudes toward the hospice philosophy of care, attitudes toward the principle that hospice care should not hasten death, orientation toward patient-centeredness, professional exposure to working in a state where MAID is legal, and demographic characteristics. Data were analyzed via a partial proportional odds model.

Results: The sample (N = 450) comprised hospice physicians (227 [50.4%]), nurses (64 [14.2%]), social workers (74 [16.4%]), and 85 chaplains (85 [18.9%]). Results of the partial proportional odds model indicated that professional exposure to working in a state where MAID is legal was significantly associated with over twice the cumulative odds of MAID support. Although neither orientation toward patient-centered care nor attitudes toward the hospice philosophy of care was significantly associated with attitudes toward MAID, results showed that disagreement with the narrower principle that hospice care should not hasten death was significantly associated with 6-to-7 times the cumulative odds of MAID support.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that contextual factors-namely, the environments in which hospice clinicians practice-may shape attitudes toward MAID. Unanticipated results indicating that hospice professionals' adherence to hospice values was not significantly associated with attitudes toward MAID underscore the need for further research on these complex associations, given previous theoretical and empirical support.

Keywords: United States; attitudes; end of life; hospice; institutional theory; medical aid in dying; neofunctional attitude theory; values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Pope TM. Medical aid in dying: key variations among U.S. state laws. J Health Life Sci Law 2020; 14(1): 25–59.
    1. US Census Bureau. Monthly population estimates for the United States: April 1, 2020 to December 1, 2024 (NST-EST2023-POP). 2023.
    1. Public Health, 42 C.F.R. Stat. (2024).
    1. Roth AR, Canedo AR. Introduction to hospice and palliative care. Prim Care 2019; 46(3): 287–302. - PubMed
    1. Campbell CS, Cox JC. Hospice and physician-assisted death: collaboration, compliance, and complicity. Hastings Cent Rep 2010; 40(5): 26–35. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources