Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Dec;313(3):e240299.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.240299.

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Zehang Li et al. Radiology. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background The prognostic value of coronary CT angiography (CTA)-derived quantitative flow ratio (CT-QFR) remains unknown. Purpose To determine the prognostic value of CT-QFR in predicting the long-term outcomes of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)/SPECT and to determine the influence of prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognostic value of CT-QFR. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of the prospective international CORE320 study, 379 participants who underwent coronary CTA and SPECT within 60 days before ICA between November 2009 and July 2011 were included for follow-up. The coronary CTA images were analyzed to determine CT-QFR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in the 5-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for clinical variables, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to assess and compare the predictive ability of CT-QFR and ICA/SPECT. Results CT-QFR computation and 5-year follow-up data were available for 310 participants (median age, 62 years), of whom 205 (66%) were male. CT-QFR (hazard ratio, 1.9 [95% CI: 1.0, 3.5]; P = .04) and prior myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 2.5 [95% CI: 1.5, 4.0]; P < .001) were independent predictors of MACE occurrence in the 5-year follow-up. MACE-free survival rates were similar in participants with normal CT-QFR and ICA/SPECT (82% vs 80%; P = .45) and in participants with abnormal CT-QFR and ICA/SPECT findings (60% vs 57%; P = .40). In participants with prior PCI, CT-QFR had a lower AUC in predicting MACEs than in participants without prior PCI (0.44 vs 0.70; P < .001). Conclusion CT-QFR was an independent predictor of MACEs in the 5-year follow-up in participants with suspected CAD and showed similar 5-year prognostic value to ICA/SPECT; however, prior PCI affected CT-QFR ability to predict MACEs. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00934037 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of conflicts of interest: Z.L. No relevant relationships. S.T. Research grant from Pulse Medical; consulting fees from Pulse Medical; co-founder of Pulse Medical. M.B.M. No relevant relationships. G.L. No relevant relationships. Y.C. No relevant relationships. C.E.R. No relevant relationships. M.Y.C. No relevant relationships. M.D. Grants from the FP Program of the European Commission, German Research Foundation (DFG), Berlin University Alliance, and Digital Health Accelerator of the Berlin Institute of Health. J.M.M. No relevant relationships. B.R.S.M. No relevant relationships. W.Y. No relevant relationships. L.Q. No relevant relationships. F.Y. No relevant relationships. J.A.C.L. Grant support from Canon Medical Systems. A.A.Z. Grant support from Canon Medical Systems; payment for lectures from Canon Medical Systems; support for attending meetings or travel from Canon Medical Systems; editor in chief of Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Flow diagram of the study participants and follow-up analyses. CAD =
coronary artery disease, CTA = CT angiography, CT-QFR = CTA-derived
quantitative flow ratio.
Figure 1:
Flow diagram of the study participants and follow-up analyses. CAD = coronary artery disease, CTA = CT angiography, CT-QFR = CTA-derived quantitative flow ratio.
Images in a 53-year-old man with suspected coronary artery disease.
(A) The curved planar reformation images reconstructed from CT angiography
(CTA) demonstrate intermediate stenosis on the middle segment of the left
anterior descending artery (LAD) (arrow on the left panel) and another
intermediate stenosis on the distal segment of the right coronary artery
(RCA) (arrow on the right panel). (B) Coronary artery tree reconstructed
from CTA, with CTA-derived quantitative flow ratios presented at the distal
end of each main vessel (left anterior descending artery, 0.83; left
circumflex artery [LCX], 0.98; right coronary artery, 0.95). (C) Images from
invasive coronary angiography show a lesion with 30% diameter stenosis by
visual estimation of the left anterior descending artery (arrow on the left
panel) and another lesion with 40% diameter stenosis by visual estimation of
the right coronary artery (arrow on the right panel). (D) SPECT images were
obtained with technetium 99m–labeled imaging agents. The middle
planes of the three principal axes (left, apex to base; middle, septal to
lateral; and right, anterior to inferior) show normal myocardial perfusion
with no apparent perfusion defect.
Figure 2:
Images in a 53-year-old man with suspected coronary artery disease. (A) The curved planar reformation images reconstructed from CT angiography (CTA) demonstrate intermediate stenosis on the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (arrow on the left panel) and another intermediate stenosis on the distal segment of the right coronary artery (RCA) (arrow on the right panel). (B) Coronary artery tree reconstructed from CTA, with CTA-derived quantitative flow ratios presented at the distal end of each main vessel (left anterior descending artery, 0.83; left circumflex artery [LCX], 0.98; right coronary artery, 0.95). (C) Images from invasive coronary angiography show a lesion with 30% diameter stenosis by visual estimation of the left anterior descending artery (arrow on the left panel) and another lesion with 40% diameter stenosis by visual estimation of the right coronary artery (arrow on the right panel). (D) SPECT images were obtained with technetium 99m–labeled imaging agents. The middle planes of the three principal axes (left, apex to base; middle, septal to lateral; and right, anterior to inferior) show normal myocardial perfusion with no apparent perfusion defect.
Graph of receiver operating characteristic curves shows the diagnostic
performance of the CT angiography–derived quantitative flow ratio
(CT-QFR) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA)/SPECT combination test for
identifying participants who experienced major adverse cardiovascular events
(MACEs) in the 5-year follow-up.
Figure 3:
Graph of receiver operating characteristic curves shows the diagnostic performance of the CT angiography–derived quantitative flow ratio (CT-QFR) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA)/SPECT combination test for identifying participants who experienced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in the 5-year follow-up.
Graph of Kaplan-Meier curves of 5-year event-free survival in 310
participants according to the diagnosis (abnormal [+] or normal [-]) based
on the CT angiography–derived quantitative flow ratio (CT-QFR) and
invasive coronary angiography (ICA)/SPECT combination test for identifying
hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. MACE = major adverse
cardiovascular event.
Figure 4:
Graph of Kaplan-Meier curves of 5-year event-free survival in 310 participants according to the diagnosis (abnormal [+] or normal [-]) based on the CT angiography–derived quantitative flow ratio (CT-QFR) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA)/SPECT combination test for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. MACE = major adverse cardiovascular event.

Comment in

References

    1. Knuuti J , Wijns W , Saraste A , et al . 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes . Eur Heart J 2020. ; 41 ( 3 ): 407 – 477 . - PubMed
    1. Miller JM , Rochitte CE , Dewey M , et al . Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT . N Engl J Med 2008. ; 359 ( 22 ): 2324 – 2336 . - PubMed
    1. Toth G , Hamilos M , Pyxaras S , et al . Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses . Eur Heart J 2014. ; 35 ( 40 ): 2831 – 2838 . - PubMed
    1. Arbab-Zadeh A , Fuster V . From detecting the vulnerable plaque to managing the vulnerable patient: JACC state-of-the-art review . J Am Coll Cardiol 2019. ; 74 ( 12 ): 1582 – 1593 . - PubMed
    1. Tonino PA , De Bruyne B , Pijls NH , et al . Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention . N Engl J Med 2009. ; 360 ( 3 ): 213 – 224 . - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources