Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 May 30;40(6):1147-1160.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae261.

The soluble guanylate cyclase activator runcaciguat significantly improves albuminuria in patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The soluble guanylate cyclase activator runcaciguat significantly improves albuminuria in patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

Ron T Gansevoort et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. .

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: In chronic kidney disease (CKD) the nitric oxide (NO)-soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway is impaired. Runcaciguat, an sGC activator, activates heme-free sGC, restoring cGMP production. This phase 2a trial studied the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of runcaciguat in CKD patients with or without sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i).

Methods: Patients with CKD and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or heart failure, plus type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or hypertension, were enrolled. All were receiving stable maximum tolerated renin-angiotensin system inhibitors with or without SGLT2i. They were randomized 3:1 to runcaciguat once daily, titrated weekly (30-120 mg if tolerated), or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) (average of post-randomization Days 22, 29, and 57 vs baseline). CONCORD was separately powered for CKD and T2D with stable SGLT2i comedication, CKD and T2D without SGLT2i, and non-diabetic CKD.

Results: Of 243 patients randomized, 229 were included in the full analysis set (FAS) and 170 in the per-protocol set (PPS). In the PPS, UACR decreased by -45.2% versus placebo with runcaciguat in patients with CKD without SGLT2i (P < 0.001) and by -48.1% versus placebo in patients with CKD taking SGLT2i (P = 0.02) In the FAS, the relative reductions were -46.9% (P < 0.001) and -44.8% (P = 0.01), respectively. No significant difference was observed between patients with or without SGLT2i. In non-diabetic CKD, UACR was reduced versus baseline with runcaciguat, but the change was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 7% of patients receiving runcaciguat and 8% receiving placebo.

Conclusion: Runcaciguat improved albuminuria in patients with CKD, irrespective of concomitant SGLT2i. Runcaciguat was well tolerated. sGC activation may represent a novel kidney-protective treatment in CKD patients (funded by Bayer AG; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04507061).

Keywords: albuminuria; chronic kidney disease; sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors; soluble guanylate cyclase activator; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.T.G. reports receiving grants from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, the Dutch Kidney Foundation and Heart Foundation, Galapagos, Otsuka, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. D.C.W. reports receiving grants for consultancy fees from Bayer AG, Eledon, Galderma, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mundipharma, Tricida, and Vifor; speaker fees from Amgen, Astellas, Mundipharma, and Zydus; honoraria from Astellas and Boehringer Ingelheim; and provides ongoing consultancy for AstraZeneca. He also provided support to the KDIGO Guideline Development. F.M.D. reports receiving consultancy fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Mundipharma, and payment or honoraria from ALTER Medica and Daiichi Sankyo. M.S. reports nothing to disclose. D.T., M.B., K.P., and F.F. are full-time employees of Bayer AG. S.K. is a full-time employee and stockholder of Bayer AG. R.E.S. reports receiving grants to his institution from Ablative Solution, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, IPPmed, Medtronic, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Recor; and speaker and advisor fees from Ablative Solutions, Apontis, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Recor, and Servier.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
CONCORD study design. aDown-titration could be performed once because of tolerability issues or due to safety concerns. This dose was then maintained until the end of treatment. o.d.: once daily; R: randomization.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
CONSORT flow diagram. If a subject had more than one validity finding that excluded them from an analysis set, all the findings are displayed. aProhibited medication (mineralocorticosteroid): n = 1; conflict with treatment schedule: n = 1; rescreened but randomization not in time window: n = 1. bPatients had up to three reasons for exclusion. ACEi: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; CKD: chronic kidney disease; FAS: full analysis set; PPS: per-protocol set; SAS: safety analysis set; SGLT2i: sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor; UACR: urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Patient disposition.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Mean change in UACR over time (95% CI, ANCOVA) (PPS). Estimated mean % change from baseline and 95% CI (ANCOVA) for (A) patients with diabetic CKD not on SGLT2i; (B) patients with diabetic CKD on SGLT2i; and (C) patients with non-diabetic CKD. Placebo upper limit for the diabetic CKD with SGLT2i stratum was 2.649 (165%) on Day 15, 2.318 (132%) on Day 22, 1.987 (98.7%) on Day 29, and 2.310 (131%) on Day 87 (follow-up). ANCOVA: analysis of covariance; CI: confidence interval; CKD: chronic kidney disease; NS: not significant; PPS: per-protocol set; SGLT2i: sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor; UACR: urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Absolute change in (A) eGFR versus baselinea, (B) SBP versus baselinea, (C) DBP versus baselinea, (D) heart rate versus baselinea, and (E) HbA1c versus baselineb. aEstimated mean absolute change from baseline and 95% CI (ANCOVA) of the PPS for the average across Days 22, 29, and 57. bEstimated mean absolute change from baseline and 95% CI (ANCOVA) of the PPS for Day 57. ANCOVA: analysis of covariance; CI: confidence interval; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CKD-EPI: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI equation); HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; PPS: per-protocol set; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SGLT2i: sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor.

References

    1. International Society of Nephrology . ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas. 2023. Available at: https://www.theisn.org/initiatives/global-kidney-health-atlas/ (25 March 2024, date last accessed).
    1. Foreman KJ, Marquez N, Dolgert A et al. Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death: reference and alternative scenarios for 2016-40 for 195 countries and territories. Lancet North Am Ed 2018;392:2052–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31694-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group . KDIGO 2022 clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2022;102:S1–S127. 10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee . 11. Chronic kidney disease and risk management: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024;47:S219–S230. 10.2337/dc24-S011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kovesdy CP, Isaman D, Petruski-Ivleva N et al. Chronic kidney disease progression among patients with type 2 diabetes identified in US administrative claims: a population cohort study. Clin Kidney J 2021;14:1657–64. 10.1093/ckj/sfaa200 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

Grants and funding