Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 3;26(3):509-517.
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae320.

CT-derived extracellular volume fraction in aortic stenosis, cardiac amyloidosis, and dual pathology

Affiliations

CT-derived extracellular volume fraction in aortic stenosis, cardiac amyloidosis, and dual pathology

Masafumi Kidoh et al. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. .

Abstract

Aims: To investigate CT-derived extracellular volume fraction (CT-ECV) in patients with lone aortic stenosis (AS), dual pathology of AS and transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (AS-ATTR), and lone ATTR, and to examine the diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values of CT-ECV for differentiating between patients with lone AS and AS-ATTR and between patients with lone AS and lone ATTR.

Methods and results: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with severe AS (including lone AS and AS-ATTR) and lone ATTR who underwent CT-ECV analysis and technetium 99 m pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) scintigraphy. The diagnostic performance of CT-ECV for detecting cardiac amyloidosis was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Of 138 patients (mean age, 80 ± 8; 96 men), 55 had lone AS, 19 had AS-ATTR, and 64 had lone ATTR. CT-derived extracellular volume fraction of patients with lone AS was 31 ± 5%. CT-derived extracellular volume fraction was significantly lower in patients with AS-ATTR than lone ATTR (45 ± 12% vs. 53 ± 13%, P = 0.04). The AUC for differentiating patients with AS-ATTR from lone AS was lower than for lone ATTR from lone AS [0.90 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96) vs. 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.98)]. The cut-off values of CT-ECV for differentiation between patients with lone AS and AS-ATTR were lower than those between patients with lone AS and lone ATTR [36.6% vs. 38.5% (Youden index)]. There was no significant difference in the proportion of 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy grade between patients with AS-ATTR and lone ATTR (P = 0.20).

Conclusion: Despite no significant difference in degree of ATTR between patients with AS-ATTR and lone ATTR, CT-ECV of patients with dual AS-ATTR pathology was significantly lower than that of patients with lone ATTR. The diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values of CT-ECV for differentiating between patients with lone AS and AS-ATTR were lower than those between patients with lone AS and lone ATTR.

Keywords: aortic stenosis; cardiac CT; cardiac amyloidosis; extracellular volume fraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplementary concepts