Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Apr;57(4):1189-1198.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04304-1. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

Comparing post-treatment urinary and colorectal procedures in prostate cancer patients using population-based linked data

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing post-treatment urinary and colorectal procedures in prostate cancer patients using population-based linked data

Tenaw Tiruye et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate urinary and colorectal procedures among men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

Methods: We studied 16,271 (RP = 8516 and EBRT = 7755) South Australian men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2001 and 2021. Colorectal and urinary procedures were extracted from hospital admission procedure codes and Medical Benefits Schedule item codes. Rates were estimated at 30-days, 90-days, 6-months, 1-year, 2-years and 5-years post-treatment. We estimated the average treatment effect of RP (compared with EBRT) by applying propensity-matched analyses, accounting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Subgroup analyses were undertaken for different treatment periods (2001-2010 vs. 2011-2021).

Results: At 1-year post-treatment, the crude rates of colorectal procedures were 43 and 70/1000 person-years among RP and EBRT patients, respectively, while crude rates for urinary procedures were 258 and 74/1000 person-years, respectively. Propensity matched analyses indicated that patients undergoing RP underwent more post-treatment urinary procedures, being 21.2% higher at 6-months and 16.3% higher at 5-years than men who received EBRT. Colorectal procedures were slightly more frequent among RP than EBRT patients during the first 90-days but less frequent from 1-year onwards (5.9% lower at 5-years among RP group). Between 2011 and 2021, there were considerably fewer urinary procedures for men who underwent RP than those treated between 2001 and 2010.

Conclusion: There is a statistically significant difference in the frequency of post-treatment procedures between patients who underwent RP and those who had EBRT, which likely indicates a difference in adverse treatment effects. These findings may lead to more informed treatment decision-making.

Keywords: Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Consent for publication: Not applicable.

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2024) Cancer data in Australia. Available from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/contents... . cited 15 Aug 2024
    1. Donovan JL et al (2016) Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1425–1437 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Tiruye T et al (2023) Risk of secondary malignancy following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Sci Rep 13(1):20083 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Tiruye T et al (2022) Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer. BMC Urol 22(1):169 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Corsini C et al (2024) Patient-reported side effects 1 year after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a register-based nationwide study. Eur Urol Oncol 7(3):605–613 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources