Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 3;8(6):560-567.
doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0030. eCollection 2024 Nov 27.

Comparative Analysis of Characteristics of Lower- and Mid-Cervical Spine Injuries in the Elderly

Affiliations

Comparative Analysis of Characteristics of Lower- and Mid-Cervical Spine Injuries in the Elderly

Naoki Segi et al. Spine Surg Relat Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Elderly patients have a higher frequency of upper cervical fractures caused by minor trauma; nevertheless, the clinical differences between mid- and lower-cervical (C6-C7) injuries are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the epidemiology of lower- and mid-cervical injuries in the elderly.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 451 patients aged 65 years or older who had mid- or lower-cervical fractures/dislocations. Patients' demographic and treatment data were examined and compared based on mid- and lower-cervical injuries.

Results: There were 139 patients (31%) with lower-cervical injuries and 312 (69%) with mid-cervical injuries. High-energy trauma (60% vs. 47%, p=0.025) and dislocation (55% vs. 45%, p=0.054) were significantly experienced more often by elderly patients with lower-cervical injuries than by patients with mid-cervical injuries. Although the incidence of key muscle weakness at the C5 to T1 levels were all significantly lower in patients with lower-cervical injuries than those with mid-cervical injuries, impairments at C5 occurred in 49% of them, and at C6, in 65%. No significant differences were found in the rates of death, pneumonia, or tracheostomy requirements, and no significant differences existed in ambulation or ASIA impairment scale grade for patients after 6 months of treatment.

Conclusions: Elderly patients with lower-cervical fractures/dislocations were injured by high-energy trauma significantly more often than patients with mid-cervical injuries. Furthermore, half of the patients with lower-cervical injuries had mid-cervical level neurological deficits with a relatively high rate of respiratory complications.

Keywords: cervical spinal cord injury; cervicothoracic injury; elderly; lower-cervical injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient selection flowchart. AO, AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) Spine classification; AIS, ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) impairment scale.

Similar articles

References

    1. Asemota AO, Ahmed AK, Purvis TE, et al. Analysis of cervical spine injuries in elderly patients from 2001 to 2010 using a nationwide database: increasing incidence, overall mortality, and inpatient hospital charges. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e114-30. - PubMed
    1. Ryan MD, Henderson JJ. The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Injury. 1992;23(1):38-40. - PubMed
    1. Vaccaro AR, Madigan L, Ehrler DM. Contemporary management of adult cervical odontoid fractures. Orthopedics. 2000;23(10):1109-13. - PubMed
    1. Amin A, Saifuddin A. Fractures and dislocations of the cervicothoracic junction. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(6):499-505. - PubMed
    1. Lenoir T, Hoffmann E, Thevenin-Lemoine C, et al. Neurological and functional outcome after unstable cervicothoracic junction injury treated by posterior reduction and synthesis. Spine J. 2006;6(5):507-13. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources