Comparative Analysis of Characteristics of Lower- and Mid-Cervical Spine Injuries in the Elderly
- PMID: 39659382
- PMCID: PMC11625708
- DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0030
Comparative Analysis of Characteristics of Lower- and Mid-Cervical Spine Injuries in the Elderly
Abstract
Introduction: Elderly patients have a higher frequency of upper cervical fractures caused by minor trauma; nevertheless, the clinical differences between mid- and lower-cervical (C6-C7) injuries are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the epidemiology of lower- and mid-cervical injuries in the elderly.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 451 patients aged 65 years or older who had mid- or lower-cervical fractures/dislocations. Patients' demographic and treatment data were examined and compared based on mid- and lower-cervical injuries.
Results: There were 139 patients (31%) with lower-cervical injuries and 312 (69%) with mid-cervical injuries. High-energy trauma (60% vs. 47%, p=0.025) and dislocation (55% vs. 45%, p=0.054) were significantly experienced more often by elderly patients with lower-cervical injuries than by patients with mid-cervical injuries. Although the incidence of key muscle weakness at the C5 to T1 levels were all significantly lower in patients with lower-cervical injuries than those with mid-cervical injuries, impairments at C5 occurred in 49% of them, and at C6, in 65%. No significant differences were found in the rates of death, pneumonia, or tracheostomy requirements, and no significant differences existed in ambulation or ASIA impairment scale grade for patients after 6 months of treatment.
Conclusions: Elderly patients with lower-cervical fractures/dislocations were injured by high-energy trauma significantly more often than patients with mid-cervical injuries. Furthermore, half of the patients with lower-cervical injuries had mid-cervical level neurological deficits with a relatively high rate of respiratory complications.
Keywords: cervical spinal cord injury; cervicothoracic injury; elderly; lower-cervical injury.
Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Asemota AO, Ahmed AK, Purvis TE, et al. Analysis of cervical spine injuries in elderly patients from 2001 to 2010 using a nationwide database: increasing incidence, overall mortality, and inpatient hospital charges. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e114-30. - PubMed
-
- Ryan MD, Henderson JJ. The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Injury. 1992;23(1):38-40. - PubMed
-
- Vaccaro AR, Madigan L, Ehrler DM. Contemporary management of adult cervical odontoid fractures. Orthopedics. 2000;23(10):1109-13. - PubMed
-
- Amin A, Saifuddin A. Fractures and dislocations of the cervicothoracic junction. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(6):499-505. - PubMed
-
- Lenoir T, Hoffmann E, Thevenin-Lemoine C, et al. Neurological and functional outcome after unstable cervicothoracic junction injury treated by posterior reduction and synthesis. Spine J. 2006;6(5):507-13. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous