Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 10;14(4):e70005.
doi: 10.1002/pul2.70005. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Screening and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic lung disease (PH-CLD): A consensus statement from the pulmonary vascular research institute's innovative drug development initiative-group 3 pulmonary hypertension

Affiliations
Review

Screening and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic lung disease (PH-CLD): A consensus statement from the pulmonary vascular research institute's innovative drug development initiative-group 3 pulmonary hypertension

P Vitulo et al. Pulm Circ. .

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a frequent complication of chronic lung disease (CLD). However, PH is difficult to diagnose early since accompanying symptoms overlap and are similar to those of the underlying CLD. In most cases the PH is mild to moderate and therefore physical signs may be absent or subtle. This consensus paper provides insight into the clues that might suggest the presence of occult PH in patients with CLD. An overview of current diagnostic tools and emerging diagnostic technologies is provided as well as guidance for the work-up and diagnosis of PH in patients with CLD.

Keywords: chronic lung disease; diagnosis; imaging; pulmonary hypertension; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Vitulo has consulted for MSD and AOP and has received support for attending congresses from MSD, Janssen all of which not related to this manuscript. Dr. Piccari has received research funding from and served as a speaker for Janssen and Ferrer, advised Janssen, Ferrer and United Therapeutics as well as received support for attending congresses from Janssen, MSD and Ferrer, all of which not related to this manuscript. Dr. S. John Wort received honoraria from Janssen, MSD, Bayer, Ferrer and Acceleron for advisory boards, received honoraria from Janssen for educational activity, received unrestricted research grants from Janssen, Ferrer and Bayer, and travel grants, conference registration and accommodation from Janssen and Ferrer. Dr. Shlobin has consulted for UT, Bayer, ALtavant, Aerovate, Jenssen&Jenssen Jenssen& Jenssen and Merck, and is on the speaker bureau for UT, Bayer, and J&J; Dr. Stockbridge has no conflict of interest. Dr. Kovacs reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Actelion, Janssen, Bayer, GSK, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Chiesi, Vitalaire, Ferrer, and AOP outside the submitted work. Dr. Vizza has no conflict of interest regarding this topic. Dr. Hassoun serves on a scientific advisory board for Merck, an activity unrelated to the current work. Dr. Olschewski received funding from Actelion, AOP, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Chiesi, GSK, Iqvia, Janssen, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Ludwig Boltzmann Society, Ferrer, MedUpdate, and Mondial not related to this work. Dr. Girgis received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and research funding from UT. Dr. Nikkho is an employee of Bayer AG.Dr. Nathan is a consultant for United Therapeutics, Bellerophon, Third Pole, Roche, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Insmed, Roivant, Merck and Daewoong. He is on the speakers bureau for United Therapeutics and Boehringer‐Ingelheim. He is also on the Gossamer Bio Board of Directors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A case of ILD with severe PH demonstrating enlargement of the pulmonary artery (a) in the context of severe fibrotic disease (b).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Highlights the cumulative contribution of clinical features and test parameters in risk stratifying the probability of PH detection, and thereby to confirm the diagnosis. While this is a suggested algorithm, the final decision to proceed with RHC should be based on the individual patient characteristics and the likelihood that the results will change management. Legend: 6MWT = 6‐min walk test; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; DLco, single breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; FVC, forced vital capacity; JVD, jugular venous distension; NT‐proBNP, N terminal proBNP; O2, oxygen; P2‐second pulmonic heart sound; RV, right ventricle; VO2, maximal oxygen consumption; WHO FC, World Health Organization functional class.

References

    1. Nathan SD, Shlobin OA, Ahmad S, Urbanek S, Barnett SD. Pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary function testing in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2007;131:657–663. 10.1378/chest.06-2485 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braganza M, Shaw J, Solverson K, Vis D, Janovcik J, Varughese RA, Thakrar MV, Hirani N, Helmersen D, Weatherald J. A prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination for pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2019;155:982–990. 10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. García AR, Piccari L. Emerging phenotypes of pulmonary hypertension associated with COPD: a field guide. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2022;28:343–351. 10.1097/mcp.0000000000000890 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King CS, Shlobin OA. The trouble with group 3 pulmonary hypertension in interstitial lung disease. Chest. 2020;158:1651–1664. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.046 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sobiecka M, Lewandowska K, Kober J, Franczuk M, Skoczylas A, Tomkowski W, Kuś J, Szturmowicz M. Can a new scoring system improve prediction of pulmonary hypertension in newly recognised interstitial lung diseases? Lung. 2020;198:547–554. 10.1007/s00408-020-00346-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources